From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51241BA2E; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726237774; cv=none; b=aaoi8VvVoTXImb1kYcyKxxn22PmHPSCxSpe5b6bWGpeYF3m/Jo7p4wYirb10axQWotxYnip8Z/58PiBxHQ/C/C0HA91Wqu1/P2rd7YJIrGuk+LWZn4BS4WnzfSf+PesJ/qapDXsbrTuQehBuF+tlGv9FxZWYWammmUW4AMd2mnk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726237774; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n4CypEvhl+akW3fJZ9oHywQiaIVLr4KPiPhcov62YQs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cpyq55rb4z+UVh0pFM3Hl7r8JoD+Ot50SMFYCFI1BLk7KWRM2f76ebZjAAU5zB4j8EfCmmkFsqFLJq8CuTLrLr1D92nKzR4XoiDseEbPJJuXOEQYoMu3zfCQdZgNfmui6EYt2b5OFFa96EqoELCDYxAstF8DORewV6hpm1aIxMw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=GD8gobdz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="GD8gobdz" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 48D8cqx7026511; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:29:31 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=6orxksetWM7LC3aR/f1cAshO7y6 ll9SRw6ogrQry/sc=; b=GD8gobdzDn7cePakFUrFyAnAvG5el24kxWBpvgLhb5I /Dt6rJuqjAC7lFDrOhF2HXq33XnKwwx+wdMnmi42c/I02M8ByZr+5bg1Cv3U4YNx 5Jx5ZXRWWtEB3Jv2kU9o6V9hpOsDe8gQIwgk1kZFBCEjc9zom8RKDY5t2XHJy8+s 9Bgj+ju0KR/XastcM9sfp3J5IB8hgSwcshn7FG6QSiMmEKtwiXnDsLnOODc41qEv Ycbm8Q0P3bE5XeRCS5hyAyqL65IjO2jLIk+Bh0CotJzZmNTOR1nX6dboWNZN3GXa 4zUi4ggtiK8deLCwzYCFKIIcqysrnGGK9i4XpK1tAaA== Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41gd8m2d3y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:29:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 48DCR4vA032091; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:29:30 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.226]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41h2nn6mgj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:29:30 +0000 Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.106]) by smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 48DETQN449807714 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:29:26 GMT Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8F220043; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:29:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC32B20040; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:29:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.171.6.86]) by smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:29:25 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:29:24 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Alexander Gordeev , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Harald Freudenberger , Stefan Liebler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] s390/vdso: getrandom() vdso implementation Message-ID: <20240913142924.30385-B-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240913130544.2398678-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Wh0O_NEiFcsXimFLq5Hhe9mRPQUFn1oD X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Wh0O_NEiFcsXimFLq5Hhe9mRPQUFn1oD X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-13_11,2024-09-13_02,2024-09-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=465 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2408220000 definitions=main-2409130098 Hi Jason, > > On first glance, this series looks perfect. I can't comment too much on > > the s390 parts, but first pass of the crypto/vdso/api parts looks spot > > on. Nice going. > > > > Were you thinking you'd like me to take these via the random.git tree > > for 6.12 next week, or were you thinking of delaying it a release and > > taking it into the arch tree for 6.13? > > If you did want it to be in 6.12, assuming this series continues to look > good, I think we'd still want it to be in -next for at least a week, so > maybe that'd take the form of me sending an additional late pull during > the merge window for this. Either way, I'll defer to your judgement > here, as most of these changes are fiddly s390 things more than anything > else. This series is intended to go into 6.12. I don't see a reason to delay this for a full release cycle. If something breaks we'll fix it, as usual. So a late pull request would be perfectly fine. Alternatively we can take this via s390 also for a second pull request; whatever you prefer and is less work for you.