public inbox for linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: lkp@intel.com, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [herbert-cryptodev-2.6:master] [rhashtable]  e1d3422c95: stress-ng.syscall.ops_per_sec 98.9% regression
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 04:20:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250108-smiling-sensible-llama-d8b124@leitao> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z3zLQObsD42R6Nwz@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>

Hello Oliver,

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:35:44PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi, Breno Leitao,
> 
> > I am trying to reproduce this report, and I would appreciate some help
> > to understand what is being measured, and try to reproduce the reported
> > problem.
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 11:10:11AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > kernel test robot noticed a 98.9% regression of stress-ng.syscall.ops_per_sec on:
> > 
> > Is this metric coming from `bogo ops/s` from stress-ng?
> 
> yes, it's from bogo ops/s (real time).
> 
> one thing we want to mention is the test runs unstably upon e1d3422c95.
> as below, %stddev for it reaches 67%.

Thanks. From what I understand, this is clock time, which can vary a
lot.

I see a small variation, but, inside the standard deviation:

Kernels I've tested:
	Kernel A: 6.13-rc6 (9d89551994a43)
	Kernel B: 9d89551994a43 + cherry pick of e1d3422c95f003e ("rhashtable: Fix potential deadlock by moving schedule_work outside lock")

Average result: (Bogo op/s)
	* kernel A:
		* Average      : 2776.70
		* Min value    : 1946.22
		* Max value    : 3278.67 
		* Standard dev :  387.01

	* Kernel B:
		* Average      : 3158.60
		* Min value    : 1850.91
		* Max value    : 4120.10
		* Standard dev :  507.19

Host: Intel(R) Xeon(R) D-2191A CPU with 64GB of RAM.

I booted the machines 2 times, with A, B, kernel sequentially, and
for each case I run the following command 10 times:

	stress-ng --timeout 10 --times --verify --metrics --no-rand-seed --syscall 224

      reply	other threads:[~2025-01-08 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-27  3:10 [herbert-cryptodev-2.6:master] [rhashtable] e1d3422c95: stress-ng.syscall.ops_per_sec 98.9% regression kernel test robot
2024-12-29 22:54 ` Tejun Heo
2025-01-02  1:10   ` Herbert Xu
2025-01-02 15:45     ` Breno Leitao
2025-01-03 13:41 ` Breno Leitao
2025-01-07  6:35   ` Oliver Sang
2025-01-08 12:20     ` Breno Leitao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250108-smiling-sensible-llama-d8b124@leitao \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox