From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6954C18FC83 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 04:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741321346; cv=none; b=bTbLDvwiR5xcUEeueeyRashLCB83OqTkgIfN4KbLSd9cbOHlYGajnNwK5tUddRu+uo0NQx6AgsZIP2HAjh4IEdpaJ2Al6VkM7EOMyTL5vGfj/EGAklrjJ11coQsg2rckciyxzYWn14WNC+6Srfl/39CyKjKcVMTNjdFgU31sJsg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741321346; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mGsnUFU14gRE5OTvGZgN8fDv0j0aTIyMRktWQWR9oe4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OlnABcYyKl0pimVjsE4wD78qYlr53afrt7iaA6UgmQsT9z+cBuyvS9XRVxRGvmtxvQZkYc+iWn/plhZlVINeQ3W6lbJHwv+3x4Vxv9HGTzDNtITyT//EOKNZNqKyWXXa2R7LoC+DrmZt1o2RQFsbQL9LikubDrl5tQQPE6g5hVc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mUD2x2CF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mUD2x2CF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741321344; x=1772857344; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=mGsnUFU14gRE5OTvGZgN8fDv0j0aTIyMRktWQWR9oe4=; b=mUD2x2CFYOWA94XHoyXY8OY+PQ2SW2kSStF6oBJFy2mruLDHKfhxfXZq LDpg3QRryKYcY4oNX6vaylJbjSvIPIYon+L0Gy91YRNcmxl4os6HQkAge /TfPB+JYz90xxNfsh5KQDO7kBWAiob9DR3i7AEEnBK/oMSqn1mAw0L9CU BQfRDqpD7DWWtwbgiMxSERL93T/befLmm/dzQ7IBHvrG5lCD9pxZ9ZBU/ QeH3KL2nXkGoQQLMC02Nu3phb1Gm5IZ7MbYj/lB+XXt4VSjDGq1A11seJ MjEMfThzTaj6FtFgHgfV1FzLdVW19QRlW3CJFYCwHgqJspg7OF57YkFt/ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hmGCZ0+WS/yL9GpeXqtfMg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OzjELHrmQciJhxSraYomqA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11365"; a="67737585" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,228,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="67737585" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2025 20:22:24 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zrRamg93SeuRWoipnKOWPA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: x3YwzdfsSa+lzOU0WSkzZQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,228,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="119397843" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 76cde6cc1f07) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2025 20:22:22 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 76cde6cc1f07 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tqPE4-000ONm-13; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 04:22:20 +0000 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 12:22:07 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Herbert Xu , Eric Biggers Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Crypto Mailing List Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH] crypto: scatterwalk - Add memcpy_sglist Message-ID: <202503071218.9J2sUblV-lkp@intel.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Herbert, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master] [also build test ERROR on next-20250306] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.14-rc5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Herbert-Xu/crypto-scatterwalk-Add-memcpy_sglist/20250306-113457 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z8kXhLb681E_FLzs%40gondor.apana.org.au patch subject: [v3 PATCH] crypto: scatterwalk - Add memcpy_sglist config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250307 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250307/202503071218.9J2sUblV-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250307/202503071218.9J2sUblV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503071218.9J2sUblV-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> crypto/scatterwalk.c:107:41: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2 107 | slen = scatterwalk_next(&swalk, nbytes); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/crypto/scatterwalk.h:129:21: note: 'scatterwalk_next' declared here 129 | static inline void *scatterwalk_next(struct scatter_walk *walk, | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 130 | unsigned int total, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 131 | unsigned int *nbytes_ret) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ crypto/scatterwalk.c:108:41: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2 108 | dlen = scatterwalk_next(&dwalk, nbytes); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/crypto/scatterwalk.h:129:21: note: 'scatterwalk_next' declared here 129 | static inline void *scatterwalk_next(struct scatter_walk *walk, | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 130 | unsigned int total, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 131 | unsigned int *nbytes_ret) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> crypto/scatterwalk.c:110:16: error: no member named 'addr' in 'struct scatter_walk' 110 | memcpy(dwalk.addr, swalk.addr, len); | ~~~~~ ^ arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:150:42: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy' 150 | #define memcpy(t, f, n) __builtin_memcpy(t, f, n) | ^ crypto/scatterwalk.c:110:28: error: no member named 'addr' in 'struct scatter_walk' 110 | memcpy(dwalk.addr, swalk.addr, len); | ~~~~~ ^ arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:150:45: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy' 150 | #define memcpy(t, f, n) __builtin_memcpy(t, f, n) | ^ crypto/scatterwalk.c:111:35: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2 111 | scatterwalk_done_dst(&dwalk, len); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/crypto/scatterwalk.h:174:20: note: 'scatterwalk_done_dst' declared here 174 | static inline void scatterwalk_done_dst(struct scatter_walk *walk, | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 175 | void *vaddr, unsigned int nbytes) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ crypto/scatterwalk.c:112:35: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2 112 | scatterwalk_done_src(&swalk, len); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/crypto/scatterwalk.h:158:20: note: 'scatterwalk_done_src' declared here 158 | static inline void scatterwalk_done_src(struct scatter_walk *walk, | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 159 | const void *vaddr, unsigned int nbytes) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 6 errors generated. vim +107 crypto/scatterwalk.c 90 91 void memcpy_sglist(struct scatterlist *dst, struct scatterlist *src, 92 unsigned int nbytes) 93 { 94 struct scatter_walk swalk; 95 struct scatter_walk dwalk; 96 97 if (unlikely(nbytes == 0)) /* in case sg == NULL */ 98 return; 99 100 scatterwalk_start(&swalk, src); 101 scatterwalk_start(&dwalk, dst); 102 103 do { 104 unsigned int slen, dlen; 105 unsigned int len; 106 > 107 slen = scatterwalk_next(&swalk, nbytes); 108 dlen = scatterwalk_next(&dwalk, nbytes); 109 len = min(slen, dlen); > 110 memcpy(dwalk.addr, swalk.addr, len); 111 scatterwalk_done_dst(&dwalk, len); 112 scatterwalk_done_src(&swalk, len); 113 nbytes -= len; 114 } while (nbytes); 115 } 116 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memcpy_sglist); 117 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki