From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
Jason@zx2c4.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/crypto: blake2s: Disable self test if CONFIG_CRYPTO isn't enabled
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 12:56:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250420195657.GA291714@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250418145945.GA1890@quark.localdomain>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 07:59:45AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 09:02:16PM +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote:
> > From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>
> >
> > Currently CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_DISABLE_TESTS is used to remove
> > the self test code. CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_DISABLE_TESTS depends on
> > CONFIG_CRYPTO so its impossible to disable the self test without
> > enabling CONFIG_CRYPTO.
> >
> > If you don't want CONFIG_CRYPTO you probably don't want self tests
> > so remove the self tests in that case too.
> >
> > Fixes: 66d7fb94e4ff ("crypto: blake2s - generic C library implementation and selftest")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>
> > ---
> > lib/crypto/blake2s.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Acked-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
>
> This is okay as a quick fix, but really the lib/crypto/ tests should be
> refactored into KUnit tests that aren't dependent on CRYPTO. FWIW, I recently
> fixed this for the CRC functions: lib/tests/crc_kunit.c.
>
My series "[PATCH 0/9] Clean up the crypto testing options"
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250419161543.139344-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/) also
fixes this by replacing CRYPTO_MANAGER_DISABLE_TESTS with a non-negated option.
(But we should still disentangle the library tests from CRYPTO at some point.)
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-20 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 12:02 [PATCH] lib/crypto: blake2s: Disable self test if CONFIG_CRYPTO isn't enabled Daniel Palmer
2025-04-18 14:59 ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-20 19:56 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250420195657.GA291714@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=daniel@0x0f.com \
--cc=daniel@thingy.jp \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox