From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: arm64/sha256 - fix build when CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 09:05:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250508160523.GA1218@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXEPvPKg3i9NkaYN+m4pGfw6P05g-H6_Dmb3AsQyRmU7MA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 01:12:28PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 19:09, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> >
> > Fix the build of sha256-ce.S when CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y by passing
> > the correct label to the cond_yield macro. Also adjust the code to
> > execute only one branch instruction when CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=n.
> >
> > Fixes: 6e36be511d28 ("crypto: arm64/sha256 - implement library instead of shash")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505071811.yYpLUbav-lkp@intel.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/lib/crypto/sha256-ce.S | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/crypto/sha256-ce.S b/arch/arm64/lib/crypto/sha256-ce.S
> > index a8461d6dad634..f3e21c6d87d2e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/lib/crypto/sha256-ce.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/crypto/sha256-ce.S
> > @@ -121,14 +121,15 @@ CPU_LE( rev32 v19.16b, v19.16b )
> >
> > /* update state */
> > add dgav.4s, dgav.4s, dg0v.4s
> > add dgbv.4s, dgbv.4s, dg1v.4s
> >
> > + /* return early if voluntary preemption is needed */
> > + cond_yield 1f, x5, x6
> > +
>
> This will yield needlessly when the condition hits during the final iteration.
>
> > /* handled all input blocks? */
> > - cbz x2, 1f
> > - cond_yield 3f, x5, x6
> > - b 0b
> > + cbnz x2, 0b
cond_yield doesn't actually yield, though. It just checks whether yielding is
needed. So the behavior is the same: on the last iteration this function
returns 0 (i.e. 0 blocks remaining), regardless of whether it gets to the end by
jumping there due to TSK_TI_PREEMPT being set or by falling through after seeing
nblocks==0. We could keep the nblocks==0 check first, but the cond_yield check
is lightweight and it's probably better to avoid the extra branch instruction on
every other iteration.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-07 17:09 [PATCH] crypto: arm64/sha256 - fix build when CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y Eric Biggers
2025-05-08 1:38 ` Herbert Xu
2025-05-08 11:12 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-08 16:05 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-05-08 16:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250508160523.GA1218@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox