public inbox for linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Jain@formenos.rohan.me.apana.org.au, Ayush <Ayush.Jain3@amd.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: lib/sha256 - Disable SIMD
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 12:06:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250516190637.GA32835@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250516181322.GGaCeAQjnIVQx_tX_R@fat_crate.local>

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:13:22PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:03:16AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > That's silly.  We should just fix x86's irq_fpu_usable() to return false
> > before the CPU is properly initialized. It already checks a per-cpu bool, so
> > it shouldn't be too hard to fit that in.
> 
> Probably.
> 
> There's a fpu__init_cpu() call almost right after load_ucode_ap() which causes
> this thing.
> 
> I'm not sure how much initialized stuff you need for SHA256 SIMD... perhaps
> swap fpu__init_cpu() and load_ucode_ap() calls after proper code audit whether
> that's ok.
> 
> Or add a "is the FPU initialized" check, as you propose, which is probably
> easier.
> 
> As always, the x86 CPU init path is nasty and needs careful auditing.

There are a few different ways in which __apply_microcode_amd() can get called:

    __apply_microcode_amd
        load_ucode_amd_bsp
            load_ucode_bsp
                x86_64_start_kernel
        apply_microcode_amd
            load_ucode_amd_ap
                load_ucode_ap
                    start_secondary
            microcode_ops::apply_microcode
                load_secondary
                __load_primary
        reload_ucode_amd
            reload_early_microcode
                microcode_bsp_resume
                    mc_syscore_ops::resume
                        syscore_resume
                    __restore_processor_state
                        restore_processor_state

What would you say about going back to my earlier plan to make irq_fpu_usable()
return false when irqs_disabled(), like what arm64 does?  (As I had in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250220051325.340691-2-ebiggers@kernel.org/).
I think that would handle all these cases, as well as others.  We'd need to fix
__save_processor_state() to save the FPU state directly without pretending that
it's using kernel-mode FPU, but I don't know of any issues besides that.  Then
we could also delete the irqs_disabled() checks that I added to
kernel_fpu_begin() and kernel_fpu_end().

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-16 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16 11:22 cryptodev linux-next splat Borislav Petkov
2025-05-16 11:34 ` Herbert Xu
2025-05-16 11:48   ` [PATCH] crypto: lib/sha256 - Disable SIMD Herbert Xu
2025-05-16 12:27     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-16 17:03     ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-16 18:13       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-16 19:06         ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-05-16 20:34           ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250516190637.GA32835@sol \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=Ayush.Jain3@amd.com \
    --cc=Jain@formenos.rohan.me.apana.org.au \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox