From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/17] crypto: jitterentropy - use default sha3 implementation
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 21:20:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251020212057.GA83624@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062228.1760956530@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:35:30AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Why don't you take my approach and just call lib/crypto/sha3 directly rather
> than using a crypto/ object as an intermediary if that crypto/ object is just
> going to wrap lib/crypto?
We'll do that, and thanks for writing the patch already! But that's
something to do in a later patch after adding the library API. Your
patch description kind of raised a red flag:
Make the jitterentropy RNG use lib/crypto/sha3 rather than
crypto/sha3.
For some reason it goes absolutely wild if crypto/sha3 is
reimplemented to use lib/crypto/sha3, but it's fine if it uses lib
directly.
That implies that your changes broke crypto_shash, so you *had* to
convert to the library right away as a workaround for that.
That shouldn't be necessary. We should generally keep crypto_shash
working for now. In which case, all jitterentropy should need for now
is a simple substitution s/sha3-256-generic/sha3-256/.
We'll convert jitterentropy to use the library API too. It's better,
after all. But it should be done later and because the library API is
better -- not as some sort of workaround.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-20 0:50 [PATCH 00/17] SHA-3 library Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 01/17] s390/sha3: Rename conflicting functions Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 02/17] arm64/sha3: " Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 03/17] lib/crypto: Add SHA3-224, SHA3-256, SHA3-384, SHA3-512, SHAKE128, SHAKE256 Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 7:07 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-10-20 10:39 ` David Howells
2025-10-20 23:54 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 04/17] lib/crypto: Move the SHA3 Iota transform into the single round function Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 05/17] lib/crypto: Add SHA3 kunit tests Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 06/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Fix libsha3 build condition Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 07/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Use appropriate conversions in sha3_keccakf_generic() Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 08/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Drop unfinished SHAKE support from gen-hash-testvecs.py Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 09/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Consistently use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 10/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Replace redundant ad-hoc test with FIPS test Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 11/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Simplify the API Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 10:33 ` David Howells
2025-10-20 17:18 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 12/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Document one-shot functions in header and improve docs Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 13/17] crypto: arm64/sha3 - Update sha3_ce_transform() to prepare for library Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 14/17] lib/crypto: arm64/sha3: Migrate optimized code into library Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 15/17] lib/crypto: s390/sha3: " Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 14:00 ` Holger Dengler
2025-10-20 14:23 ` Holger Dengler
2025-10-20 17:57 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-21 7:24 ` Holger Dengler
2025-10-21 8:43 ` Holger Dengler
2025-10-21 15:49 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-24 14:24 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-10-24 16:11 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 16/17] crypto: jitterentropy - use default sha3 implementation Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 10:35 ` David Howells
2025-10-20 21:20 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-10-20 0:50 ` [PATCH 17/17] crypto: sha3 - Reimplement using library API Eric Biggers
2025-10-21 6:53 ` David Howells
2025-10-22 10:13 ` [PATCH 00/17] SHA-3 library Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251020212057.GA83624@google.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).