From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH libcrypto 1/2] array_size: introduce min_array_size() function decoration
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 15:24:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251118232435.GA6346@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251118170240.689299-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/array_size.h b/include/linux/array_size.h
> index 06d7d83196ca..8671aee11479 100644
> --- a/include/linux/array_size.h
> +++ b/include/linux/array_size.h
I think compiler.h would be a better place?
> @@ -10,4 +10,11 @@
> */
> #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr))
>
> +/**
> + * min_array_size - parameter decoration to hint to the compiler that the
> + * passed array should have at least @n elements
> + * @n: minimum number of elements, after which the compiler may warn
> + */
> +#define min_array_size(n) static n
"after which" => "below which"
Anyway, I actually have a slight preference for just using 'static n'
directly, without the unnecessary min_array_size() wrapper. But if
other people prefer min_array_size(), that's fine with me too. At least
this is what Linus asked for
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/CAHk-=wj6J5L5Y+oHc-i9BrDONpSbtt=iEemcyUm3dYnZ3pXxxg@mail.gmail.com/).
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 17:02 [PATCH libcrypto 1/2] array_size: introduce min_array_size() function decoration Jason A. Donenfeld
2025-11-18 17:02 ` [PATCH libcrypto 2/2] crypto: chacha20poly1305: statically check fixed array lengths Jason A. Donenfeld
2025-11-19 10:36 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-19 12:45 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-19 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-19 16:46 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2025-11-19 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-19 18:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-11-18 23:24 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-11-18 23:31 ` [PATCH libcrypto 1/2] array_size: introduce min_array_size() function decoration Jason A. Donenfeld
2025-11-19 19:04 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2025-11-19 19:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-11-19 23:02 ` david laight
2025-11-18 23:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-22 2:37 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251118232435.GA6346@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).