From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/crypto: aesgcm: Don't disable IRQs during AES block encryption
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 16:11:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402230959.GB2910@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331024430.51755-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 07:44:30PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> aes_encrypt() now uses AES instructions when available instead of always
> using table-based code. AES instructions are constant-time and don't
> benefit from disabling IRQs as a constant-time hardening measure.
>
> In fact, on two architectures (arm and riscv) disabling IRQs is
> counterproductive because it prevents the AES instructions from being
> used. (See the may_use_simd() implementation on those architectures.)
>
> Therefore, let's remove the IRQ disabling/enabling and leave the choice
> of constant-time hardening measures to the AES library code.
>
> Note that currently the arm table-based AES code (which runs on arm
> kernels that don't have ARMv8 CE) disables IRQs, while the generic
> table-based AES code does not. So this does technically regress in
> constant-time hardening when that generic code is used. But as
> discussed in commit a22fd0e3c495 ("lib/crypto: aes: Introduce improved
> AES library") I think just leaving IRQs enabled is the right choice.
> Disabling them is slow and can cause problems, and AES instructions
> (which modern CPUs have) solve the problem in a much better way anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---
> lib/crypto/aesgcm.c | 25 +++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux.git/log/?h=libcrypto-next
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 2:44 [PATCH] lib/crypto: aesgcm: Don't disable IRQs during AES block encryption Eric Biggers
2026-03-31 5:02 ` Eric Biggers
2026-03-31 7:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-31 20:55 ` Eric Biggers
2026-04-01 20:18 ` Eric Biggers
2026-04-02 23:11 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260402230959.GB2910@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox