From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [crypto] 2f204fe718: stress-ng.af-alg.ops_per_sec 113.7% improvement
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:27:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715162749.GA1794078@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202607152204.a0a3bf98-lkp@intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 11:00:46PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> we don't have enough knowledge to deeply analyze the impact of this commit
> to stress-ng.af-alg performance tests.
>
> along with the major kpi improvement:
>
> 7756377 +113.7% 16578454 stress-ng.af-alg.ops_per_sec
>
> we also noticed lots of misc tests seem have changes, e.g.
>
> 697423 -9.5% 630908 ± 2% stress-ng.af-alg.aes_cipher_ops/sec
> 245103 -100.0% 0.00 stress-ng.af-alg.blowfish_cipher_ops/sec
> 369646 -100.0% 0.00 stress-ng.af-alg.camellia_cipher_ops/sec
> 162192 -100.0% 0.00 stress-ng.af-alg.cast5_cipher_ops/sec
> 115113 -100.0% 0.00 stress-ng.af-alg.cast6_cipher_ops/sec
>
> we don't know if these are expected behavior upon 2f204fe718.
> so this report is just FYI what we observed in our tests.
>
>
>
> kernel test robot noticed a 113.7% improvement of stress-ng.af-alg.ops_per_sec on:
>
>
> commit: 2f204fe718f5bf519013cc2536ad7bb2cbb51661 ("crypto: af_alg - Add af_alg_restrict sysctl, defaulting to 1")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
That commit makes AF_ALG block access to some algorithms by default,
overridable by a sysctl. Apparently these performance tests
misinterpret that as a change in performance.
It actually doesn't make much sense to do performance testing on AF_ALG
at all anymore, given that AF_ALG is deprecated. A limited form of
AF_ALG is being left in place just for backwards compatibility with a
few programs. None of those programs use it in a performance-critical
way, as far as I know.
To the extent that it's still done at all, it shouldn't test random
algorithms like "ecb(cast5)" that are obsolete and unused.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 15:00 [linux-next:master] [crypto] 2f204fe718: stress-ng.af-alg.ops_per_sec 113.7% improvement kernel test robot
2026-07-15 16:27 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715162749.GA1794078@google.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox