Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Holger Dengler <dengler@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] s390/crypto: Replace cond_resched() with msleep(1)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:40:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731084027.GE776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18c36e42-8f96-479c-8152-2da3f5034f04@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 09:44:57AM +0200, Holger Dengler wrote:

> > Yes, guest migration is very likely far more disruptive than most
> > anything else. Perhaps clarify the code comment to include some of this
> > explanation?
> 
> I agree, the comment is not telling all main key points. What about the
> following?
> 
> /*
>  * Protected key expired due to relocation to another
>  * host. The long runnning re-wrap has no asynchronous
>  * completion notification, so polling is required.
>  * Trigger a re-schedule of this request by returning
>  * -ENOSPC ("hardware queue full") to the crypto engine.
>  * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
>  * tell scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
>  */
> 
> (I would leave it up to Heiko to merge the comment in his series, or let
> Harald/me do it in a separate patch)

Right, perhaps something like so, avoiding the endless copy/paste ?

---
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
index 8cfe6166c193..973436592318 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
@@ -548,16 +548,7 @@ static int ecb_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 
 	rc = ecb_paes_do_crypt(ctx, req_ctx, tested, true);
 	if (rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
-		/*
-		 * Protected key expired, conversion is in process.
-		 * Trigger a re-schedule of this request by returning
-		 * -ENOSPC ("hardware queue is full") to the crypto engine.
-		 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
-		 * tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
-		 */
-		cond_resched();
-		pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
-		return -ENOSPC;
+		return pkey_handle_expired();
 	} else if (rc) {
 		skcipher_walk_done(walk, rc);
 	}
@@ -814,16 +805,7 @@ static int cbc_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 
 	rc = cbc_paes_do_crypt(ctx, req_ctx, tested, true);
 	if (rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
-		/*
-		 * Protected key expired, conversion is in process.
-		 * Trigger a re-schedule of this request by returning
-		 * -ENOSPC ("hardware queue is full") to the crypto engine.
-		 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
-		 * tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
-		 */
-		cond_resched();
-		pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
-		return -ENOSPC;
+		return pkey_handle_expired();
 	} else if (rc) {
 		skcipher_walk_done(walk, rc);
 	}
@@ -1122,16 +1104,7 @@ static int ctr_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 
 	rc = ctr_paes_do_crypt(ctx, req_ctx, tested, true);
 	if (rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
-		/*
-		 * Protected key expired, conversion is in process.
-		 * Trigger a re-schedule of this request by returning
-		 * -ENOSPC ("hardware queue is full") to the crypto engine.
-		 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
-		 * tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
-		 */
-		cond_resched();
-		pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
-		return -ENOSPC;
+		return pkey_handle_expired();
 	} else if (rc) {
 		skcipher_walk_done(walk, rc);
 	}
@@ -1565,16 +1538,7 @@ static int xts_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 
 	rc = xts_paes_do_crypt(ctx, req_ctx, tested, true);
 	if (rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
-		/*
-		 * Protected key expired, conversion is in process.
-		 * Trigger a re-schedule of this request by returning
-		 * -ENOSPC ("hardware queue is full") to the crypto engine.
-		 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
-		 * tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
-		 */
-		cond_resched();
-		pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
-		return -ENOSPC;
+		return pkey_handle_expired();
 	} else if (rc) {
 		skcipher_walk_done(walk, rc);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
index 03ca33ffe6cc..020a1beb2e22 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
@@ -887,16 +887,7 @@ static int phmac_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 	case OP_FINUP:
 		rc = phmac_kmac_update(req, true);
 		if (rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
-			/*
-			 * Protected key expired, conversion is in process.
-			 * Trigger a re-schedule of this request by returning
-			 * -ENOSPC ("hardware queue full") to the crypto engine.
-			 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
-			 * tell scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
-			 */
-			pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
-			cond_resched();
-			return -ENOSPC;
+			return pkey_handle_expired();
 		} else if (rc) {
 			hwh_advance(hwh, rc);
 			goto out;
@@ -907,18 +898,8 @@ static int phmac_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 		fallthrough;
 	case OP_FINAL:
 		rc = phmac_kmac_final(req, true);
-		if (rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
-			/*
-			 * Protected key expired, conversion is in process.
-			 * Trigger a re-schedule of this request by returning
-			 * -ENOSPC ("hardware queue full") to the crypto engine.
-			 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
-			 * tell scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
-			 */
-			pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
-			cond_resched();
-			return -ENOSPC;
-		}
+		if (rc == -EKEYEXPIRED)
+			return pkey_handle_expired();
 		break;
 	default:
 		/* unknown/unsupported/unimplemented asynch op */
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pkey.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pkey.h
index 0af5ac4f646b..9c5f31b50bc8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pkey.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pkey.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/ioctl.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <uapi/asm/pkey.h>
 
 /*
@@ -44,4 +45,20 @@ int pkey_key2protkey(const u8 *key, u32 keylen,
  */
 #define PKEY_XFLAG_NOCLEARKEY 0x0002
 
+static inline int pkey_handle_expired(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Protected key expired due to relocation to another
+	 * host. The long runnning re-wrap has no asynchronous
+	 * completion notification, so polling is required.
+	 * Trigger a re-schedule of this request by returning
+	 * -ENOSPC ("hardware queue full") to the crypto engine.
+	 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
+	 * tell scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
+	 */
+	msleep(1);
+	pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
+	return -ENOSPC;
+}
+
 #endif /* _KAPI_PKEY_H */

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30  5:29 [PATCH v3 0/4] s390: Remove or replace cond_resched() calls Heiko Carstens
2026-07-30  5:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] s390/crypto: Replace cond_resched() with msleep(1) Heiko Carstens
2026-07-30  7:47   ` Holger Dengler
2026-07-30 10:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-30 11:34     ` Holger Dengler
2026-07-30 12:48       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-31  7:44         ` Holger Dengler
2026-07-31  8:40           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-07-31 11:56             ` Heiko Carstens
2026-07-30  5:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: s390: Remove cond_resched() calls Heiko Carstens
2026-07-30  8:51   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-30  5:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] " Heiko Carstens
2026-07-30  5:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] s390/cio: " Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731084027.GE776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox