From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
To: dengler@linux.ibm.com, fcallies@linux.ibm.com, ifranzki@linux.ibm.com
Cc: freude@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PHMAC when req is pushed to crypto engine
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:16:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817141654.77940-7-freude@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817141654.77940-1-freude@linux.ibm.com>
When a request is transferred to the engine via
crypto_transfer_hash_request_to_engine() there are two return codes
signaling a successful transfer: EINPROGRESS and EBUSY. However the
correct handling of EBUSY was missing and has been added as a return
code indicating a successful transfer to the crypto engine.
Fixes: cbbc675506cc ("crypto: s390 - New s390 specific protected key hash phmac")
Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.17+
---
arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
index 03ca33ffe6cc..9d77198b22ff 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
@@ -629,6 +629,8 @@ static int phmac_update(struct ahash_request *req)
req_ctx->async_op = OP_UPDATE;
atomic_inc(&tfm_ctx->via_engine_ctr);
rc = crypto_transfer_hash_request_to_engine(phmac_crypto_engine, req);
+ if (rc == -EBUSY)
+ rc = -EINPROGRESS;
if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
atomic_dec(&tfm_ctx->via_engine_ctr);
}
@@ -667,6 +669,8 @@ static int phmac_final(struct ahash_request *req)
req_ctx->async_op = OP_FINAL;
atomic_inc(&tfm_ctx->via_engine_ctr);
rc = crypto_transfer_hash_request_to_engine(phmac_crypto_engine, req);
+ if (rc == -EBUSY)
+ rc = -EINPROGRESS;
if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
atomic_dec(&tfm_ctx->via_engine_ctr);
}
@@ -716,6 +720,8 @@ static int phmac_finup(struct ahash_request *req)
/* req->async_op has been set to either OP_FINUP or OP_FINAL */
atomic_inc(&tfm_ctx->via_engine_ctr);
rc = crypto_transfer_hash_request_to_engine(phmac_crypto_engine, req);
+ if (rc == -EBUSY)
+ rc = -EINPROGRESS;
if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
atomic_dec(&tfm_ctx->via_engine_ctr);
}
--
2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 14:16 [PATCH v3 0/6] Fixes and rework for paes_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 14:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] s390/crypto: Fix return code handling at skcipher_walk_done in PAES algorithms Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 14:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 14:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] s390/crypto: Fix use of mutex in atomic context in PAES Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 14:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing cra_flags in paes_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 14:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PAES when req is pushed to crypto engine Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 14:16 ` Harald Freudenberger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817141654.77940-7-freude@linux.ibm.com \
--to=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fcallies@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox