From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@amd.com>
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com,
peterz@infradead.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
ardb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, aik@amd.com,
Michael.Roth@amd.com, KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com,
Tycho.Andersen@amd.com, Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com,
ackerleytng@google.com, jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com,
rientjes@google.com, jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, john.allen@amd.com,
darwi@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 4/5] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 13:52:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260829205208.GDapNGeGMOs02IrkGS@fat_crate.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c9502278f68af9da19f0dd583ba303d0e6d66d2.1786389115.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 07:22:10PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> +/*
> + * RMPOPT optimizations skip RMP checks at 1GB granularity if this range of
> + * memory does not contain any SNP guest memory.
> + *
> + * @pa is a system physical address; RMPOPT operates on the containing 1GB.
> + */
> +static void rmpopt(u64 pa)
> +{
> + u64 pa_start = ALIGN_DOWN(pa, SZ_1G);
> + enum rmpopt_op_type op = RMPOPT_OP_VERIFY_AND_REPORT_STATUS;
> +
> + /*
> + * RMPOPT (F2 0F 01 FC): RAX = 1GB-aligned SPA, RCX = op type, CF set if
> + * the range was optimized (result unused on this path).
> + *
> + * Binutils does not support the RMPOPT mnemonic yet, so the instruction
> + * is encoded with .byte.
> + */
I don't know whether you've checked the binutils sources but this should have
the version of binutils which supports it and I think there is no such version
yet - I've pinged binutils team to see what their plans are.
> + asm volatile(".byte 0xf2, 0x0f, 0x01, 0xfc"
> + :: "a" (pa_start), "c" (op)
> + : "memory", "cc");
> +}
> +
> +/* on_each_cpu() callback: optimize the whole RMPOPT range on this CPU. */
> +static void rmpopt_scan_range(void *arg)
> +{
> + u64 pa;
> +
> + for (pa = rmpopt_pa_start; pa < rmpopt_pa_end; pa += SZ_1G)
> + rmpopt(pa);
> +}
> +
> +static void rmpopt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + int this_cpu;
> +
> + /*
> + * RMPOPT scans the RMP table, stores the result of the scan in the
> + * reserved processor memory. The RMP scan is the most expensive
> + * part. If a second RMPOPT occurs, it can skip the expensive scan
> + * if they can see a cached result in the reserved processor memory.
> + *
> + * Run RMPOPT on one CPU first (the leader), then on every other primary
> + * thread (the followers). A follower skips the expensive RMP scan by
> + * reusing the cached scan results the leader produced.
> + *
> + * migrate_disable() pins this work to the current CPU so it stays the
> + * leader for the whole leader loop: this_cpu remains valid and the
> + * RMPOPT instruction runs on it.
> + */
> + migrate_disable();
> + this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + cpumask_andnot(rmpopt_follower_mask, rmpopt_cpumask,
> + topology_sibling_cpumask(this_cpu));
> +
> + rmpopt_scan_range(NULL);
> +
> + migrate_enable();
> +
> + /*
> + * Followers: one IPI per remaining core, each optimizing the whole
> + * range. Each runs with interrupts disabled, but only issues cache-hit
> + * RMPOPTs (the leader populated the scan cache above), so the window is
> + * short. cpus_read_lock() is intentionally not held: CPU hotplug is
> + * disabled the entire time SNP is active (see snp_prepare()), and this
> + * work only runs while SNP is active, so the follower set stays valid.
> + */
> + on_each_cpu_mask(rmpopt_follower_mask, rmpopt_scan_range, NULL, true);
If the leader ran once and the results are cached, then does it matter if
I run RMPOPT on it again? IOW, what's stopping me from doing
on_each_cpu_mask(rmpopt_cpumask, rmpopt_scan_range, NULL, true);
and don't care about leaders and followers at all?
Also, rmpopt_mask is cpu_primary_thread_mask and you don't need any of those
gymnastics.
IOW, this is how my cleanup ontop looks like so far:
diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
index 55a6e2319899..a1f6f3111517 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ static void *rmp_bookkeeping __ro_after_init;
static u64 probed_rmp_base, probed_rmp_size;
-static cpumask_var_t rmpopt_cpumask, rmpopt_follower_mask;
static u64 rmpopt_pa_start, rmpopt_pa_end;
enum rmpopt_op_type {
@@ -587,11 +586,9 @@ static void rmpopt_disable(void)
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rmpopt_delayed_work);
destroy_workqueue(rmpopt_wq);
- for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_primary_thread_mask)
wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, 0);
- free_cpumask_var(rmpopt_cpumask);
- free_cpumask_var(rmpopt_follower_mask);
rmpopt_pa_start = rmpopt_pa_end = 0;
rmpopt_wq = NULL;
}
@@ -632,16 +629,9 @@ static bool rmpopt_capable(void)
*/
static void rmpopt(u64 pa)
{
- u64 pa_start = ALIGN_DOWN(pa, SZ_1G);
enum rmpopt_op_type op = RMPOPT_OP_VERIFY_AND_REPORT_STATUS;
+ u64 pa_start = ALIGN_DOWN(pa, SZ_1G);
- /*
- * RMPOPT (F2 0F 01 FC): RAX = 1GB-aligned SPA, RCX = op type, CF set if
- * the range was optimized (result unused on this path).
- *
- * Binutils does not support the RMPOPT mnemonic yet, so the instruction
- * is encoded with .byte.
- */
asm volatile(".byte 0xf2, 0x0f, 0x01, 0xfc"
:: "a" (pa_start), "c" (op)
: "memory", "cc");
@@ -656,43 +646,22 @@ static void rmpopt_scan_range(void *arg)
rmpopt(pa);
}
-static void rmpopt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
+static void do_rmpopt_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
int this_cpu;
/*
- * RMPOPT scans the RMP table, stores the result of the scan in the
- * reserved processor memory. The RMP scan is the most expensive
- * part. If a second RMPOPT occurs, it can skip the expensive scan
- * if they can see a cached result in the reserved processor memory.
- *
- * Run RMPOPT on one CPU first (the leader), then on every other primary
- * thread (the followers). A follower skips the expensive RMP scan by
- * reusing the cached scan results the leader produced.
- *
- * migrate_disable() pins this work to the current CPU so it stays the
- * leader for the whole leader loop: this_cpu remains valid and the
- * RMPOPT instruction runs on it.
+ * RMPOPT caches the results of a RMP table scan in reserved processor
+ * memory, allowing future invocations to skip such costly operations.
*/
migrate_disable();
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
- cpumask_andnot(rmpopt_follower_mask, rmpopt_cpumask,
- topology_sibling_cpumask(this_cpu));
-
rmpopt_scan_range(NULL);
migrate_enable();
- /*
- * Followers: one IPI per remaining core, each optimizing the whole
- * range. Each runs with interrupts disabled, but only issues cache-hit
- * RMPOPTs (the leader populated the scan cache above), so the window is
- * short. cpus_read_lock() is intentionally not held: CPU hotplug is
- * disabled the entire time SNP is active (see snp_prepare()), and this
- * work only runs while SNP is active, so the follower set stays valid.
- */
- on_each_cpu_mask(rmpopt_follower_mask, rmpopt_scan_range, NULL, true);
+ on_each_cpu_mask(cpu_primary_thread_mask, rmpopt_scan_range, NULL, true);
}
void snp_setup_rmpopt(void)
@@ -729,30 +698,7 @@ void snp_setup_rmpopt(void)
return;
}
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rmpopt_delayed_work, rmpopt_work_handler);
-
- if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rmpopt_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
- pr_err("Failed to allocate RMPOPT cpumask\n");
- destroy_workqueue(rmpopt_wq);
- rmpopt_wq = NULL;
- return;
- }
-
- if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rmpopt_follower_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
- pr_err("Failed to allocate RMPOPT follower cpumask\n");
- free_cpumask_var(rmpopt_cpumask);
- destroy_workqueue(rmpopt_wq);
- rmpopt_wq = NULL;
- return;
- }
-
- /*
- * The RMPOPT_BASE MSR has core scope. All primary threads are online,
- * otherwise SNP would not have been enabled.
- */
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
- if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask);
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rmpopt_delayed_work, do_rmpopt_work);
rmpopt_pa_start = ALIGN_DOWN(PFN_PHYS(min_low_pfn), SZ_1G);
rmpopt_base = rmpopt_pa_start | MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_ENABLE;
@@ -761,7 +707,7 @@ void snp_setup_rmpopt(void)
* Per-CPU RMPOPT tables cover at most 2 TB. Program each core's
* RMPOPT_BASE with the start of RAM to optimize up to 2 TB.
*/
- for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_primary_thread_mask)
wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, rmpopt_base);
rmpopt_pa_end = ALIGN(PFN_PHYS(max_pfn), SZ_1G);
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-29 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 19:20 [PATCH v12 0/5] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
2026-08-10 19:21 ` [PATCH v12 1/5] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-08-10 19:21 ` [PATCH v12 2/5] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-08-10 19:21 ` [PATCH v12 3/5] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-08-27 2:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v12 4/5] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-08-29 20:52 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2026-08-31 20:00 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-09-01 19:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-10 19:22 ` [PATCH v12 5/5] x86/sev: Re-enable RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
2026-08-27 16:29 ` [PATCH v12 0/5] Add RMPOPT support Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260829205208.GDapNGeGMOs02IrkGS@fat_crate.local \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=Ashish.Kalra@amd.com \
--cc=KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackyli@google.com \
--cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox