From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: crypto: Use AES-CBC and AES-ECB libraries
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:48:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831214818.GF86114@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apXwXLRpBUIWQuC5@gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 11:25:54PM +0200, Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 12:21:39PM +0100, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > There are library APIs for both of these now, which are much easier to
> > use and more efficient. Reimplement BPF crypto on top of them, greatly
> > simplifying the code. As part of this, the bpf_crypto_type abstraction
> > layer is removed, as it's not useful.
> >
>
> This relates to my recent patch fixing state preservation in lskcipher's
> unaligned path, which exercised ARC4 through BPF:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260829194314.42685-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com
>
> While looking at your patch, I tested the actual BPF-visible algorithm
> surface. The ECB and CBC templates allow considerably more than AES.
Right, apparently any "crypto_cipher" can be composed with "ecb" or
"cbc" as an "lskcipher". I think in this case it's only of theoretical
interest and is a bug, not a feature, though. Especially given the
presence of ARC4, DES, TEA, etc. on that list.
We see this a lot with the "Crypto API", where a new kernel feature
actually uses one or two algorithms, then unnecessarily allows every
single algorithm to be theoretically reachable (including insecure,
obsolete, or nonsense options) just because the API takes a string.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 19:21 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: crypto: Use AES-CBC and AES-ECB libraries Eric Biggers
2026-08-31 20:29 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 21:59 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-31 22:43 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-31 21:25 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-31 21:48 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831214818.GF86114@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox