Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr, Jason@zx2c4.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] lib/crypto: arm64: Fix lost Poly1305 carry when resuming NEON" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 09:48:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261021164836.GB1879@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021154806.GA1879@quark>

On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 08:48:08AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> [+Cc linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org]
> 
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 04:40:37PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > 
> > The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> 
> It's a clean cherry-pick, as git detects the rename of
> poly1305-armv8.pl.  So there should be no need to require this to be
> resent.  Also, missing Cc to linux-crypto.
> 
> Same for 6.12, 6.6, 6.1, 5.15, and 5.10.

As I've said before, the reason this keeps happening is that Greg's
stable scripts perform a cherry-pick by first formatting the commit as a
patch file with the default 3 lines of context, then applying it with
'patch' using the default fuzz of 2.

(The second step seems to occur in the 'apply_it' script, which isn't
public.  But based on the observed behavior, it must be what it does.)

This process is buggy compared to simply using 'git cherry-pick':

- It has no rename detection.  Any file rename, like what happened for
  this commit where poly1305-armv8.pl is in different locations in
  different branches, results in FAILED.  This happens regularly.

- Incorrect backports due to only *one* line of context being
  considered (since 3 - 2 = 1).  For examples of this, see
  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260512173933.811124271@linuxfoundation.org/
  and
  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260515154719.961677988@linuxfoundation.org/

  This is easily reproducible.  For example for the first one:

  git checkout -d v6.12.87
  git cherry-pick 2909f0d4994fb4306bf116df5ccee797791fce2c
  git show # correct backport

  git checkout -d v6.12.87
  git format-patch -1 --no-base 2909f0d4994fb4306bf116df5ccee797791fce2c
  patch -p1 < 0001-usb-typec-tcpm-reset-internal-port-states-on-soft-re.patch
  git diff # incorrect backport that was actually sent out

  The second example is even worse, as there the incorrect backport was
  actually released.

Just using 'git cherry-pick', as contributors are already being asked to
do in the FAILED emails themselves, avoids these problems.

Can this please be fixed?  This outdated cherry-pick process is reducing
the quality of the stable releases.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2026102137-contently-unshaven-7da4@gregkh>
2026-10-21 15:48 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] lib/crypto: arm64: Fix lost Poly1305 carry when resuming NEON" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree Eric Biggers
2026-10-21 16:48   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-10-28 18:20     ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261021164836.GB1879@quark \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox