Re: [PATCH 2/8] xor/arm: Replace vectorized implementation with arm64's intrinsics

[Josh Law <joshlaw48@gmail.com>]

Hi ard.

I like this patch.

So, I'd be crazy not to say what I love here.

+		/* p1 ^= p2 */
+		v0 = veorq_u64(vld1q_u64(dp1 +  0), vld1q_u64(dp2 +  0));
+		v1 = veorq_u64(vld1q_u64(dp1 +  2), vld1q_u64(dp2 +  2));
+		v2 = veorq_u64(vld1q_u64(dp1 +  4), vld1q_u64(dp2 +  4));
+		v3 = veorq_u64(vld1q_u64(dp1 +  6), vld1q_u64(dp2 +  6));
+
+		/* p1 ^= p3 */
+		v0 = veorq_u64(v0, vld1q_u64(dp3 +  0));
+		v1 = veorq_u64(v1, vld1q_u64(dp3 +  2));
+		v2 = veorq_u64(v2, vld1q_u64(dp3 +  4));
+		v3 = veorq_u64(v3, vld1q_u64(dp3 +  6));
+
+		/* store */
+		vst1q_u64(dp1 +  0, v0);
+		vst1q_u64(dp1 +  2, v1);
+		vst1q_u64(dp1 +  4, v2);
+		vst1q_u64(dp1 +  6, v3);
+
+		dp1 += 8;
+		dp2 += 8;
+		dp3 += 8;
+	} while (--lines > 0);
+}

I really like how clean this is, I'm personally nodding my head here

Taking the "bad" guesswork of the compiler here is also amazing, it also
guarantees we won't get stupid regressions in the future.

Also, that performance boost is even better ;) 

I'm not the biggest expert of this subdirectory, but I understand it well.

So well,

Reviewed-by: Josh Law <joshlaw48@gmail.com>


Thanks! (I will review your lib patches) :)