From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] crypto: only call put_page on referenced and used pages
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:28:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4360758.DiGJTW58Mu@positron.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6581903.GBJMzZudEe@tauon.atsec.com>
Am Dienstag, 13. September 2016, 13:27:34 CET schrieb Stephan Mueller:
Hi Herbert,
> Am Dienstag, 13. September 2016, 18:08:16 CEST schrieb Herbert Xu:
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> > This patch appears to be papering over a real bug.
> >
> > The async path should be exactly the same as the sync path, except
> > that we don't wait for completion. So the question is why are we
> > getting this crash here for async but not sync?
>
> At least one reason is found in skcipher_recvmsg_async with the following
> code path:
>
> if (txbufs == tx_nents) {
> struct scatterlist *tmp;
> int x;
> /* Ran out of tx slots in async request
> * need to expand */
> tmp = kcalloc(tx_nents * 2, sizeof(*tmp),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tmp)
> goto free;
>
> sg_init_table(tmp, tx_nents * 2);
> for (x = 0; x < tx_nents; x++)
> sg_set_page(&tmp[x], sg_page(&sreq->tsg[x]),
> sreq->tsg[x].length,
> sreq->tsg[x].offset);
> kfree(sreq->tsg);
> sreq->tsg = tmp;
> tx_nents *= 2;
> mark = true;
> }
>
>
> ==> the code allocates twice the amount of the previously existing memory,
> copies the existing SGs over, but does not set the remaining SGs to
> anything. If the caller provides less pages than the number of allocated
> SGs, some SGs are unset. Hence, the deallocation must not do anything with
> the yet uninitialized SGs.
I looked into the issue a bit deeper. In addition to the aforementioned code,
the following code seems to be a second culprit:
tx_nents = skcipher_all_sg_nents(ctx);
sreq->tsg = kcalloc(tx_nents, sizeof(*sg), GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!sreq->tsg))
goto unlock;
sg_init_table(sreq->tsg, tx_nents);
Here again, an SGL is initialized, but there are no pages mapped to the SGs.
May I ask you to reconsider this patch as well as the patch "[PATCH] crypto:
call put_page on used pages only" from September 10 since the current code of
libkcapi can easily trigger these bugs and lead to a kernel crash.
If you consider the patches papering over the heart of the problem, may I ask
for suggestions on how the mentioned code should be changed such that the
issues are removed? If the suggestion is to re-architect the memory handling
in the async part, may I ask to at least apply the patches for now with the
goal to have time for re-architecting the async code and yet have no open
holes that lead to crashes?
Thanks.
Ciao
Stephan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-11 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-12 12:43 Memory corruption in algif_skciper AIO sendpage with multiple iocb Stephan Mueller
2016-09-13 8:18 ` [PATCH v3] crypto: only call put_page on referenced and used pages Stephan Mueller
2016-09-13 10:08 ` Herbert Xu
2016-09-13 11:27 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-11-11 14:28 ` Stephan Mueller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4360758.DiGJTW58Mu@positron.chronox.de \
--to=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox