From: Stefan Hellermann <stefan@the2masters.de>
To: Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@ml.breakpoint.cc>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Michal Ludvig <michal@logix.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [crypto] padlock-AES, use generic setkey function
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:49:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47DA7443.1090508@the2masters.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080314114407.GA30663@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc>
Sebastian Siewior schrieb:
> * Stefan Hellermann | 2008-03-13 22:40:50 [+0100]:
>
>> Sebastian Siewior schrieb:
>>> Padlock AES' setkey routine is the same as exported by the generic
>>> implementation. So we could use it.
>>>
>> I tested this and "[RFC] generic_aes: export generic setkey" on a padlock-enabled Via
>> board, and did the following test:
>>
>> Create, open, write to, read from and close a linux dm-crypt device with aes-cbc-essiv,
>> aes-lrw-benbi and aes-xts-plain.
>>
>> Then I took a huge encrypted disk-image (encrypted without this patches), opened it with
>> cryptsetup-luks, booted the OS from the disc over iscsi, started a filesystem-check. The
>> check completed successful.
> Looks like an interresting setup :)
>
>> So I think this and the other patch are save.
>
> That patch uses different (but I hope the same) algorithm for key
> generation which is only used for keys >128 bit. If your dm-crypt setup
> used 192 or 256 bit keys than the test should be valid.
> In the other case (or just to be sure) please run
> |modprobe tcrypt mode=10
> which just does work.
I used cryptsetup with -s 256, so the cbc and lrw tests should be valid.
The tcrypt test succeeds, there's no difference in the dmesg-output with or without
padlock-aes loaded. I haven't checked the results with an unpatched kernel yet.
>
> Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-14 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-24 11:01 [RFC] padlock aes, unification of setkey() Sebastian Siewior
2008-02-24 11:01 ` [RFC] generic_aes: export generic setkey Sebastian Siewior
2008-03-13 21:40 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-24 11:01 ` [RFC] [crypto] padlock-AES, use generic setkey function Sebastian Siewior
2008-03-13 21:40 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-03-14 11:44 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-03-14 12:49 ` Stefan Hellermann [this message]
2008-03-14 14:16 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-04-01 13:25 ` Herbert Xu
2008-02-24 11:54 ` [RFC] padlock aes, unification of setkey() Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-24 12:51 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-02-24 20:07 ` Via Padlock Bug with LRW/XTS Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-27 8:30 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-03-02 11:20 ` [PATCH] [crypto] XTS: use proper alignment Sebastian Siewior
2008-03-02 12:04 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-03-02 13:22 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-03-02 13:49 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-03-02 14:04 ` Stefan Hellermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47DA7443.1090508@the2masters.de \
--to=stefan@the2masters.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@ml.breakpoint.cc \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal@logix.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).