From: Stefan Hellermann <stefan@the2masters.de>
To: Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@ml.breakpoint.cc>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [crypto] padlock-aes loadkey ondemand
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:38:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F28136.3080502@the2masters.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080330210152.GA25597@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc>
Sebastian Siewior schrieb:
> * Stefan Hellermann | 2008-03-30 21:03:18 [+0200]:
>
>> Hi,
> Hi,
>
>> I tested this patch with success, "512 bit key, 8192 byte blocks" is 29% faster!
> That's something.
>
>> Thanks for this work!
> np :)
>
>> Tested-By: Stefan Hellermann
>>
>> (Or what is the appropriate line here?)
> I thing that is okey if we add some numbers you provided.
>
>> Here's tcrypt mode=200 output for xts without this patch
> As far as I remember you posted once some MiB/sec dm-crypt numbers the
> last time. Could you please post them as well since I don't which block
> size is the majority of the read/write request.
Now I have more numbers :)
read from a device through dm-crypt with aes-cts-plain, 256-bit mode (512bit keysize for
cryptsetup)
without this patch: 54MB/s with plain dd(blocksize 512b), 51MB/s with dd and a blocksize
of 512kib (Yes, it's slower with a larger blocksize!)
with this patch: 63MB/s with dd and a blocksize of 512b, 64MB/s with a blocksize of 512k
(This time the larger blocksize was a little bit faster in each test)
I did 5 tests for each combination, top shows everytime ~90% user and ~0% wait
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-28 22:33 [RFC] [crypto] padlock-aes loadkey ondemand Sebastian Siewior
2008-03-30 19:03 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-03-30 21:01 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-04-01 18:38 ` Stefan Hellermann [this message]
2008-04-02 6:44 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-04-02 6:50 ` Herbert Xu
2008-04-02 7:17 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-04-02 7:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-07 14:53 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-09 11:20 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-08-31 6:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-04-02 15:48 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-04-09 16:38 ` Herbert Xu
2008-04-02 6:03 ` Herbert Xu
2008-04-02 6:26 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-04-02 6:31 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F28136.3080502@the2masters.de \
--to=stefan@the2masters.de \
--cc=linux-crypto@ml.breakpoint.cc \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox