From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [HIFN 01/n]: Endianess fixes Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 15:46:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4821B2A4.5040602@trash.net> References: <48219D24.1040702@trash.net> <20080507130011.GD23422@2ka.mipt.ru> <4821A843.9080003@trash.net> <20080507132345.GL23422@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu To: Evgeniy Polyakov Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:64935 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752698AbYEGNqq (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 09:46:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080507132345.GL23422@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Patrick McHardy (kaber@trash.net) wrote: >>> We can also be safe without volatile annotations. >>> >> Yes, will also be taken care of by a later patch :) > > I just receive them in a strange order and do not know when others will > arrive :) Appologies for imperfect ordering :) The patchset grew while fixing issues as I ran into them and attempts to reorder caused too many conflicts. The removal of volatile doesn't belong in this patch though.