From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yao Dongdong Subject: Re: [Question] AEAD crypto api for userspace can't deal with a PTlen=0 vector Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:51:15 +0800 Message-ID: <55500B13.2090400@huawei.com> References: <554B3415.3060707@huawei.com> <1449423.5ryfY6rDCG@tauon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , "Lihui (Eric)" To: Stephan Mueller Return-path: Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:8264 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756AbbEKBv2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2015 21:51:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1449423.5ryfY6rDCG@tauon> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2015/5/7 19:28, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2015, 17:44:53 schrieb Yao Dongdong: > > Hi Yao, > >> while we use crypto api for userspace to do vectors test for AEAD(aes-gcm), >> we encounter a problem. There are some test vector's PTlen is 0,for example: >> [Keylen = 128] >> [IVlen = 96] >> [PTlen = 0] >> [AADlen = 0] >> [Taglen = 128] >> >> Count = 0 >> Key = 7e93936b2e2188cfa9c9882ad901312f >> IV = b6879804163b9eaf5bfe5218 >> CT = >> AAD = >> Tag = aa77daf382d0d63480ff8c8a2dee149e >> >> In testing vectors like that, we will get an error result that the decrypt >> return is success but the right return is a ghash verify fail. >> After digging into the kernel(3.10) code, we find the function sock_aio_read >> in net/socket.c has a judgement of iocb->ki_left which will be 0 when we >> do an aes-gcm decrypt decribed above. >> >> static ssize_t sock_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov, >> unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos) >> { >> struct sock_iocb siocb, *x; >> >> if (pos != 0) >> return -ESPIPE; >> >> if (iocb->ki_left == 0) /* Match SYS5 behaviour */ >> return 0; >> >> x = alloc_sock_iocb(iocb, &siocb); >> if (!x) >> return -ENOMEM; >> return do_sock_read(&x->async_msg, iocb, iocb->ki_filp, iov, nr_segs); >> } >> >> So it directly return before calling aes-gcm decrypt. >> >> How can we deal with that? > You cannot. Currently, the interface is not intended to handle such specific > CAVS conditions (zero CT and AAD). Note, this test effectively only validates > GHASH. > > In any case, if you need to perform CAVS testing, you will only be able to do > that with a kernel module for all obscure operations CAVS requests (not only > for AEAD, but also for RNGs). > > Or you restrict your usage (and thus the CAVS testing) to CT/AAD lengths > 0. Thanks for your replay and we will modify our treatment based on your suggestions. > > Ciao > Stephan > > . > -- Kind regards, Yao Dongdong