From: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
To: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, axboe@fb.com,
david.s.gordon@intel.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
robert.jarzmik@free.fr, thomas.lendacky@amd.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
lee.nipper@gmail.com, yuan.j.kang@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] lib: introduce sg_nents_len_chained
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:19:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FC3995.8050600@cybernetics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442581036-23789-6-git-send-email-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
On 09/18/2015 08:57 AM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> + for (nents = 0, total = 0; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
> + nents++;
> + total += sg->length;
> + if (!sg_is_last(sg) && (sg + 1)->length == 0 && chained)
> + *chained = true;
> + if (total >= len)
> + return nents;
> + }
> +
>
(resending with fixed formatting; Thunderbird seems braindamaged lately)
It seems to me like the check for total >= len should be above the check
for chaining. The way the code is now, it will return chained = true if
the first "unneeded" sg vector is a chain, which does not make intuitive
sense.
But why do drivers even need this at all? Here is a typical usage:
int qce_mapsg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
enum dma_data_direction dir, bool chained)
{
int err;
if (chained) {
while (sg) {
err = dma_map_sg(dev, sg, 1, dir);
if (!err)
return -EFAULT;
sg = sg_next(sg);
}
} else {
err = dma_map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir);
if (!err)
return -EFAULT;
}
return nents;
}
Here is another:
static int talitos_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
unsigned int nents, enum dma_data_direction dir,
bool chained)
{
if (unlikely(chained))
while (sg) {
dma_map_sg(dev, sg, 1, dir);
sg = sg_next(sg);
}
else
dma_map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir);
return nents;
}
Can anyone clarify why you can't just use dma_map_sg(dev, sg, nents,
dir) always? It should be able to handle chained scatterlists just fine.
If the check for chaining is a just workaround for some problem in
dma_map_sg(), maybe it would be better to fix dma_map_sg() instead,
which would eliminate the need for sg_nents_len_chained() and all these
buggy workarounds (e.g. if chained is true, qce_mapsg() can leave the
DMA list partially mapped when it returns -EFAULT, and talitos_map_sg()
doesn't even check for errors).
One problem that I see is that sg_last() in scatterlist.c has a
"BUG_ON(!sg_is_last(ret));" if CONFIG_DEBUG_SG is enabled, and using a
smaller-than-original nents (as returned by sg_nents_len_chained()) with
the same scatterlist will trigger that bug. But that should be true
regardless of whether chaining is used or not. For example, talitos.c
calls sg_last() in a way that can trigger that bug.
For anyone willing to dig further, these are the first two commits that
introduce code like this:
4de9d0b547b9 "crypto: talitos - Add ablkcipher algorithms" (2009)
643b39b031f5 "crypto: caam - chaining support" (2012)
(CC'ing the original authors)
Tony Battersby
Cybernetics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-18 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-18 12:57 [PATCH v2] crypto: Remove duplicate code of SG helpers functions LABBE Corentin
2015-09-18 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] crypto: bfin: replace sg_count by sg_nents LABBE Corentin
2015-09-18 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] crypto: amcc replace get_sg_count by sg_nents_for_len LABBE Corentin
2015-09-18 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] crypto: sahara: replace sahara_sg_length with sg_nents_for_len LABBE Corentin
2015-09-18 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] s390: replace zfcp_qdio_sbale_count by sg_nents LABBE Corentin
2015-09-30 13:59 ` Steffen Maier
2015-09-18 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] lib: introduce sg_nents_len_chained LABBE Corentin
2015-09-18 14:01 ` Tom Lendacky
2015-09-18 16:19 ` Tony Battersby [this message]
2015-09-18 21:25 ` Tony Battersby
2015-09-21 14:19 ` Herbert Xu
2015-09-21 14:59 ` LABBE Corentin
2015-09-18 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] crypto: talitos: replace sg_count with sg_nents_len_chained LABBE Corentin
2015-09-18 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] crypto: qce: replace qce_countsg " LABBE Corentin
2015-09-18 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] crypto: caam: replace __sg_count " LABBE Corentin
2015-09-21 15:09 ` [PATCH v2] crypto: Remove duplicate code of SG helpers functions Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FC3995.8050600@cybernetics.com \
--to=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=lee.nipper@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=yuan.j.kang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).