From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
john.allen@amd.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
davem@davemloft.net
Cc: aik@amd.com, dionnaglaze@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ccp: Fix SNP panic notifier unregistration
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 16:31:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57aeb651-b7d3-49c2-a4ad-056529f62a62@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cd27c20-6439-deec-f09c-e4f6f789761c@amd.com>
Hello Tom,
On 6/4/2025 10:57 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 6/2/25 14:10, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>>
>> Panic notifiers are invoked with RCU read lock held and when the
>> SNP panic notifier tries to unregister itself from the panic
>> notifier callback itself it causes a deadlock as notifier
>> unregistration does RCU synchronization.
>
> You mean that during a panic, __sev_snp_shutdown_locked() is trying to
> unregister the notifier?
Yes.
This is the code path :
snp_shutdown_on_panic() ->
__sev_firmware_shutdown() ->
__sev_snp_shutdown_locked() ->
atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(.., &snp_panic_notifier)
So atomic_notifier_chain_unregister() is being invoked from the panic notifier (context) itself.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to check if a panic is in progress and not try to
> perform the unregister?
Yes, actually it will be easier to do that by simply checking the panic parameter in
__sev_snp_shutdown_locked().
>
> Or, is snp_panic_notifier() resilient enough to just always have it
> registered / unregistered on module load/unload?
>
For registration it makes more sense to do that only if SNP is being initialized and as part of
__sev_snp_init_locked(), for unregistration see notes below.
> Also, wouldn't a better check be snp_panic_notifier.next != NULL during
> sev_pci_exit()?
Actually i can't use snp_initialized here as it will always be false.
But i also can't use snp_panic_notifier.next != NULL, because if it has already been unregistered then
snp_panic_notifier.next may be non-NULL as unregister() would have chained it to the next notifier
on the chain.
Actually i can simply call atomic_notifier_chain_unregister() unconditionally during module unload as it
handles the case of the specific notifier already unregistered and/or not added to the chain.
Thanks,
Ashish
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>>
>> Fix SNP panic notifier to unregister itself during module unload
>> if SNP is initialized.
>>
>> Fixes: 19860c3274fb ("crypto: ccp - Register SNP panic notifier only if SNP is enabled")
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
>> index 8fb94c5f006a..942d93da1136 100644
>> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
>> @@ -1787,9 +1787,6 @@ static int __sev_snp_shutdown_locked(int *error, bool panic)
>> sev->snp_initialized = false;
>> dev_dbg(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP firmware shutdown\n");
>>
>> - atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&panic_notifier_list,
>> - &snp_panic_notifier);
>> -
>> /* Reset TMR size back to default */
>> sev_es_tmr_size = SEV_TMR_SIZE;
>>
>> @@ -2562,4 +2559,8 @@ void sev_pci_exit(void)
>> return;
>>
>> sev_firmware_shutdown(sev);
>> +
>> + if (sev->snp_initialized)
>> + atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&panic_notifier_list,
>> + &snp_panic_notifier);
>> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-02 19:10 [PATCH] crypto: ccp: Fix SNP panic notifier unregistration Ashish Kalra
2025-06-04 15:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-06-04 21:31 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57aeb651-b7d3-49c2-a4ad-056529f62a62@amd.com \
--to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dionnaglaze@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox