From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr (pegase1.c-s.fr [93.17.236.30]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E297FA94F; Tue, 20 May 2025 05:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=93.17.236.30 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747720235; cv=none; b=aHFhjeqFFexi84TPuFkJcAezcaqN/I1X6h8tiUl3bZm9EEGPRwHgdGI4/JhBHgMuh2ykUeDjuuqeMdzoysGWKFdGmuCWCGV6L8Uy4CGXkJZtsJNXirJuw0nuq4fKgJW9V4xTExcxMY/iFr/y6U15enIEDAlktbSjgJI8L22FMQ8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747720235; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HpJnIaQxNCrVPEddwkzry03hhfHcD09CbAvopBDF+rw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=D1YMEGzmH+TLjsTAH9zeOu7hwuy+SgqpDiMZmQnN346PYJyICeFgKW5H8ctZjjA9wFXWWcwkgpksJQPW+yy4DwNlBRLH5+Ukl+mpt5os0+nCRLmWqCbOvsiRkWNQy0+Xix9itjJaDG0+EfnJ4S9WJsG3QP9OHR9kRT1dgL3dJNI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=93.17.236.30 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu Received: from localhost (mailhub3.si.c-s.fr [192.168.12.233]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4b1jVC1shBz9sWb; Tue, 20 May 2025 07:17:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DBxSY6Tt1GUC; Tue, 20 May 2025 07:17:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4b1jVC0pHqz9sVS; Tue, 20 May 2025 07:17:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9598B765; Tue, 20 May 2025 07:17:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 6gA5yYbrJAGp; Tue, 20 May 2025 07:17:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.235.99] (unknown [192.168.235.99]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E518B763; Tue, 20 May 2025 07:17:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <633eb665-d1d4-4433-b81f-8ff831cf795c@csgroup.eu> Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 07:17:22 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: powerpc/poly1305 - add depends on BROKEN for now To: Herbert Xu Cc: Eric Biggers , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, naveen@kernel.org, dtsen@linux.ibm.com, segher@kernel.crashing.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20250514051847.193996-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250514162933.GB1236@sol> <02c22854-eebf-4ad1-b89e-8c2b65ab8236@csgroup.eu> Content-Language: fr-FR From: Christophe Leroy In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 20/05/2025 à 04:32, Herbert Xu a écrit : > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 03:55:16PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> >> As far as I can see related patches found in linux-next tree were not sent >> to linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org. > > I just checked and it was definitely sent to linuxppc-dev: Oops sorry, my mistake. I see them in patchwork, they still have status 'New'. > > Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Crypto Mailing List , Venkat Rao Bagalkote , Madhavan Srinivasan , Stephen Rothwell , Danny Tsen , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Michael Ellerman > >> Could you resend them, and split out the introduction of >> CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 from other parts of patch "crypto: >> powerpc/poly1305 - Add SIMD fallback" and add the lib/tishift.S in the patch >> which adds CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 ? > > I'll just revert them and mark powerpc/poly1305 as broken. You > guys can sort it out later. Fine, lets do that and make sure all necessary bits are there when enabling CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 Thanks Christophe