Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom,ice: Add sa8255p support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 19/05/2026 09:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2026 at 14:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 08:37:48PM -0700, Linlin Zhang wrote:
>>> On sa8255p, resources such as PHY, clocks, regulators, and resets are
>>> managed by remote firmware via the SCMI power protocol. As a result, the
>>> ICE driver cannot directly access clocks and must instead use power-domains
>>> to request resource configuration.
>>
>> Then how can it be compatible with qcom,inline-crypto-engine?
> 
> It is a pity there are such big differences between the SoC-integration
> "hardware" description in DT of systems with and without SCMI.
> 
> For R-Car X5H, we proposed a difference approach[1].
> Linlin: do you think this would be a viable solution for your platform?

In the cover letter I see:

"This means Linux can no longer perform various system operations (e.g.
clock, power domain, and reset control)"

I skimmed through the rest including bindings, and I do not see how you
did it differently. Patchset is mixing multiple subsystems and topics,
so it does not make easier to find what you meant.

Can you point me directly how did you do it differently? And by "it" I
mean what you comment here - "such big differences between ... "?

Best regards,
Krzysztof