From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Roman Smirnov <r.smirnov@omp.ru>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com>
Cc: <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: prevent NULL pointer dereference in find_asymmetric_key()
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:38:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84d6b0fa-4948-fe58-c766-17f87c2a2dba@omp.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D42N9ASJJSUD.EG094MFWZA4Q@kernel.org>
On 9/10/24 4:38 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
[...]
>> In find_asymmetric_key(), if all NULLs are passed in id_{0,1,2} parameters
>> the kernel will first emit WARN and then have an oops because id_2 gets
>> dereferenced anyway.
>>
>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static
>> analysis tool.
>
> Weird, I recall that I've either sent a patch to address the same site
> OR have commented a patch with similar reasoning. Well, it does not
> matter, I think it this makes sense to me.
>
> You could further add to the motivation that given the panic_on_warn
> kernel command-line parameter, it is for the best limit the scope and
> use of the WARN-macro.
I don't understand what you mean -- this version of the patch keeps
the WARN_ON() call, it just moves that call, so that the duplicate id_{0,1,2}
checks are avoided...
>> Fixes: 7d30198ee24f ("keys: X.509 public key issuer lookup without AKID")
>
> I would still call this an improvement. It overuses warn but I don't
> think this a bug.
I think warning about passing all NULL ptrs but then causing a NULL ptr
deref anyway wasn't really intended -- seems like a bug to me...
>> Suggested-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
>> Signed-off-by: Roman Smirnov <r.smirnov@omp.ru>
>> Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
>> ---
I forgot to tell Roman to place the changelog here when doing an internal
review. Anyway, here is some from me:
Changed in v2:
- kept the WARN_ON() call, just moved it to avoid extra prr checks, updated
the patch description accordingly;
- reworded the patch description according to feedback.
[...]
>> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c
>> index a5da8ccd353e..43af5fa510c0 100644
>> --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c
>> +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c
>> @@ -60,17 +60,18 @@ struct key *find_asymmetric_key(struct key *keyring,
>> char *req, *p;
>> int len;
>>
>> - WARN_ON(!id_0 && !id_1 && !id_2);
>> -
>> if (id_0) {
>> lookup = id_0->data;
>> len = id_0->len;
>> } else if (id_1) {
>> lookup = id_1->data;
>> len = id_1->len;
>> - } else {
>> + } else if (id_2) {
>> lookup = id_2->data;
>> len = id_2->len;
>> + } else {
>> + WARN_ON(1);
>
> This is totally fine. It is an improvement to the current situation.
That update also fixes a kernel oops...
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> }
>>
>> /* Construct an identifier "id:<keyid>". */
>
> Can be applied as an improvement and with the added bits about
> panic_on_warn to the commit message.
We no longer care about panic_on_warn...
> BR, Jarkko
MBR, Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 11:18 [PATCH v2] KEYS: prevent NULL pointer dereference in find_asymmetric_key() Roman Smirnov
2024-09-10 13:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-10 17:38 ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2024-09-11 13:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-11 13:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-11 14:45 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-12 14:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-13 19:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-12 13:51 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-12 14:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-12 17:36 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-12 23:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84d6b0fa-4948-fe58-c766-17f87c2a2dba@omp.ru \
--to=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
--cc=andrew.zaborowski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=r.smirnov@omp.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox