public inbox for linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Smirnov <r.smirnov@omp.ru>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com>
Cc: <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: prevent NULL pointer dereference in find_asymmetric_key()
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:45:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85607ea7-a42a-1c7b-0722-e4b63a814385@omp.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D43HH3XOAXFO.2MX7FA48VOLE9@kernel.org>

On 9/11/24 4:19 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

[...]

>>>>> In find_asymmetric_key(), if all NULLs are passed in id_{0,1,2} parameters
>>>>> the kernel will first emit WARN and then have an oops because id_2 gets
>>>>> dereferenced anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static
>>>>> analysis tool.
>>>>
>>>> Weird, I recall that I've either sent a patch to address the same site
>>>> OR have commented a patch with similar reasoning. Well, it does not
>>>> matter, I think it this makes sense to me.
>>>>
>>>> You could further add to the motivation that given the panic_on_warn
>>>> kernel command-line parameter, it is for the best limit the scope and
>>>> use of the WARN-macro.
>>>
>>>    I don't understand what you mean -- this version of the patch keeps
>>> the WARN_ON() call, it just moves that call, so that the duplicate id_{0,1,2}
>>> checks are avoided...
>>
>> I overlooked the code change (my bad sorry). Here's a better version of
>> the first paragraph:
>>
>> "find_asymmetric_keys() has nullity checks of id_0 and id_1 but ignores
>> validation for id_2. Check nullity also for id_2."
>>
>> Yep, and it changes no situation with WARN_ON() macro for better or
>> worse. It would logically separate issue to discuss and address so
>> as far as I'm concerned, with this clarification I think the change
>> makes sense to me.
> 
> Actually explicitly stating that call paths leading to WARN_ON()
> invocation are intact by the commit (as a reminder for future).

   OK...
   Do you still think the Fixes tag should be dropped (and thus the
Reported-by tag would become unnecessary?)?

> BR, Jarkko

MBR, Sergey

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-11 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-10 11:18 [PATCH v2] KEYS: prevent NULL pointer dereference in find_asymmetric_key() Roman Smirnov
2024-09-10 13:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-10 17:38   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-11 13:18     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-11 13:19       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-11 14:45         ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2024-09-12 14:12           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-13 19:51           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-12 13:51       ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-12 14:27         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-12 17:36           ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-12 23:57             ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85607ea7-a42a-1c7b-0722-e4b63a814385@omp.ru \
    --to=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
    --cc=andrew.zaborowski@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=r.smirnov@omp.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox