linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Blaise Boscaccy <bboscaccy@linux.microsoft.com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	jarkko@kernel.org, zeffron@riotgames.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, kysrinivasan@gmail.com,
	code@tyhicks.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	roberto.sassu@huawei.com, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
	Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>,
	Jordan Rome <linux@jordanrome.com>,
	Martin Kelly <martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com>,
	Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
	Matteo Croce <teknoraver@meta.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	kys@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] BPF signature verification
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:01:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734cimbli.fsf@microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACYkzJ5gXf4MOdb4scid0TaQwpwewH5Zzn2W18XB1tFBoR2CQQ@mail.gmail.com>

KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> writes:

>> And I'm saying that they are, based on wanting visibility in the LSM
>> layer, passing that along to the end user, and wanting to be able to
>> show correctness, along with mitigating an entire vector of supply chain
>> attacks targeting gen.c.
>
> What supply chain attack?I asked this earlier, you never replied, what
> does a supply chain attack here really look like?
>
>
I responded to that here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/87iklhn6ed.fsf@microsoft.com/

Warmest Regards,
Blaise

> - KP
>
>>
>> So in summary, your objection to this is that you feel it's simply "not
>> needed", and those above risks/design problems aren't actually an issue?
>>
>> > Let's have this discussion in the patch series, much easier to discuss
>> > with the code.
>>
>> I think we've all been waiting for that. Yes, lets.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-02 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-28 21:49 [PATCH 0/3] BPF signature verification Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-28 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] bpf: Add bpf_check_signature Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-29 10:11   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-05-29 15:32     ` Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-29 19:31       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-05-29 19:36         ` James Bottomley
2025-06-02 22:40   ` Paul Moore
2025-06-04 16:25   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-05-28 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] bpf: Support light-skeleton signatures in autogenerated code Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-28 21:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] bpftool: Allow signing of light-skeleton programs Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-30 16:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] BPF signature verification KP Singh
2025-05-30 20:14   ` Paul Moore
2025-05-30 20:44     ` KP Singh
2025-05-30 21:19   ` Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-30 21:32     ` KP Singh
2025-05-30 21:33       ` KP Singh
2025-05-30 22:15         ` Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-30 22:14       ` Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-30 22:19         ` KP Singh
2025-05-30 22:27           ` Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-30 22:47             ` KP Singh
2025-05-30 23:25               ` Blaise Boscaccy
2025-05-30 23:32                 ` KP Singh
2025-06-02 15:01                   ` Blaise Boscaccy [this message]
2025-06-04 16:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8734cimbli.fsf@microsoft.com \
    --to=bboscaccy@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=aspsk@isovalent.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=code@tyhicks.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=ignat@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kysrinivasan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@jordanrome.com \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=teknoraver@meta.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=zeffron@riotgames.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).