From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] crypto: doc - fix separation of cipher / req API
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:20:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877f97t8mx.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2825279.IxJ3MjTap5@positron.chronox.de>
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2016, 14:04:14 CEST schrieb Jani Nikula:
>
> Hi Jani,
>
>> The directive parameter is plural functions for a reason - you can
>> specify multiple functions in the same directive. Splitting this to
>> multiple directives causes the header file to be parsed again for each
>> directive.
>>
>> IMO this can be fixed in a follow-up patch. Same for other patches in
>> this series.
>
> Thank you very much for the hint. I followed the path what the DocBook
> to Sphinx converter generated. I will change it in my patchset, but
> may I suggest that the converter tool (tmplcvt) should be fixed, too?
I don't think it's worth the trouble.
Now it's a straightforward docproc directive to Sphinx kernel-doc
directive extension conversion, with one-to-one mapping. It would be
quite a bit more complicated to gather all of the consecutive directives
together, in a rather quickly hacked up tool which we'll throw away once
all DocBooks have been converted over.
And as I said, I think you can fix this up afterwards too. It's not
broken, it's just a bit slower.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-16 3:15 [PATCH 0/7] Conversion crypto API documentation to Sphinx Stephan Mueller
2016-10-16 3:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] crypto: doc - convert " Stephan Mueller
2016-10-16 3:17 ` [PATCH 2/7] crypto: doc - remove crypto API DocBook Stephan Mueller
2016-10-16 3:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] crypto: doc - fix source comments for Sphinx Stephan Mueller
2016-10-16 12:56 ` Markus Heiser
2016-10-16 13:03 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-10-16 13:42 ` Markus Heiser
2016-10-16 3:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] crypto: doc - fix separation of cipher / req API Stephan Mueller
2016-10-17 11:04 ` Jani Nikula
2016-10-17 12:35 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-10-17 13:20 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2016-10-16 3:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] crypto: doc - add KPP documentation Stephan Mueller
2016-10-16 3:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] crypto: doc - remove crypto_alloc_ablkcipher Stephan Mueller
2016-10-16 3:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] crypto: doc - clarify AEAD memory structure Stephan Mueller
2016-10-16 13:11 ` Markus Heiser
2016-10-16 13:20 ` Stephan Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877f97t8mx.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smueller@chronox.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).