From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>,
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@miraclelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/3] ipv6: move from sha1 to blake2s in address calculation
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:18:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rvjfw3c.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9qLPxVSypcMECUjNeFz8qeUpeDe-LiXFoZTBYnGW9=ukQ@mail.gmail.com>
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 2:50 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > Then, at some point down the road, we can talk about removing
>> > CONFIG_NET_OBSOLETE_INSECURE_ADDRCONF_HASH too.
>> >
>>
>> What is the point of having CONFIG_OLD_N_CRUSTY if all distros are
>> going to enable it indefinitely?
>
> I think there's probably some combination of
> CONFIG_NET_OBSOLETE_INSECURE_ADDRCONF_HASH and CONFIG_OLD_N_CRUSTY and
> maybe even a CONFIG_GOD_MURDERS_KITTENS that might be sufficiently
> disincentivizing? Or this ties into other general ideas on a gradual
> obsolescence->removal flow for things.
Making it a compile-time switch doesn't really solve anything, though.
It'll need to be a runtime switch for people to be able to opt-in to the
new behaviour; otherwise there would still be a flag day when
distributions switch on the new config option.
I don't think there's any reason to offload this decision on
distributions either: there's clearly a "best option" here, absent any
backwards compatibility concerns. So it's on us to design a proper
transition mechanism. Defaulting to SHA1 when stable_secret is set, as
Ard suggested, sounds like a reasonable default; then we only need a
single new value for addr_gen_mode to opt-in to using blake2s even when
setting the stable_secret.
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-13 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-12 13:12 [PATCH RFC v1 0/3] remove remaining users of SHA-1 Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-12 13:12 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/3] bpf: move from sha1 to blake2s in tag calculation Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-12 22:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-13 1:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-13 12:27 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-13 22:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-14 8:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-14 14:12 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-14 15:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-14 15:20 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-14 15:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-14 15:59 ` David Laight
2022-01-14 16:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-14 16:34 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-14 23:04 ` Jeffrey Walton
2022-01-12 13:12 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/3] ipv6: move from sha1 to blake2s in address calculation Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-12 15:49 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-12 23:05 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-12 23:31 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-13 11:15 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2022-01-13 12:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-13 12:22 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-13 12:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-13 13:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-13 13:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-13 13:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-13 13:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-13 13:54 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-13 16:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2022-01-14 16:07 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-14 16:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-14 17:41 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2022-01-14 17:58 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-12 13:12 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] crypto: sha1_generic - import lib/sha1.c locally Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-12 18:50 ` [PATCH RFC v1 0/3] remove remaining users of SHA-1 David Sterba
2022-01-12 18:57 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-01-13 3:24 ` Sandy Harris
2022-01-13 8:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-13 17:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rvjfw3c.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ek@google.com \
--cc=fgont@si6networks.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hideaki.yoshifuji@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).