From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta0.migadu.com (out-180.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F98519AD5C for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 02:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746585728; cv=none; b=hk0BXGMGOKX1jy540HlSFCAcS1RuScqJ4jWTB8FFI4WVN96Nhb4DGPCXIINzuXn3D4SDADT0x31OTPmACDwBFzgYcv9vVPEo3YOmvbZ85eCJM/dY5aQveojul6yWiqjrynt2KmTolAJxL5INUW20dfww4HJX6mwDJqWTahsC4Fg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746585728; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6etL97QEsqJN3YZrjYchxkPsyMZOXMw61jInfbT3Xw0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=rKx9Tp1OZBTdQfHVOtmkqd5RjSEPc1bXpoq911JzOhztbdqW88a4OVZOVU5H3I43jU49S6Sf/UUKf7fpMS7Mtzd3we+Pm3EV3IwOBJbohObLTxywfVbP0b2E+ev0b0dRRme2Uq9Y01NzSlfSOojm+sM825qnv1riAU3oUD9ukvE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=IObWT5zk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="IObWT5zk" Message-ID: <87e475ca-c4db-4fe4-94df-4e29f779a383@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1746585713; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jR9JKWCrpFIfn9jOgzBStj0mD3xOCH22odNml15ltfQ=; b=IObWT5zkKq5EkbWwVKTGdfdlbql9PSombG1SPX7hWaaxp/EZwXp2Nl3674HN9qu9nFmHVS RgIulIF+wOLmuBVb0Sv6jMyjKYDRkt7uDwC8waWe5ZIGzGz9EYnlcH9IWiJyaih6994gMd OrHpRZDB6IIrblHWYWCjsyBVZ6D71g8= Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 10:41:46 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add tpm_loongson.c to LOONGSON CRYPTO DRIVER entry To: Qunqin Zhao Cc: lee@kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jarkko@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, Huacai Chen References: <20250506032053.11147-1-zhaoqunqin@loongson.cn> <00196f77-1060-fe67-3e6b-6721092207d6@loongson.cn> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yanteng Si In-Reply-To: <00196f77-1060-fe67-3e6b-6721092207d6@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT 在 5/6/25 8:14 PM, Qunqin Zhao 写道: > > 在 2025/5/6 下午5:03, Yanteng Si 写道: >> 在 5/6/25 11:20 AM, Qunqin Zhao 写道: >>> Changes to Loongson TPM driver would be best reviewed by the Loongson >>> crypto driver maintainers. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Qunqin Zhao >>> Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen >>> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen >>> --- >>> v8-v9: None >>> v7: Added tag from Jarkko and Huacai >>> v6: "tpm_lsse.c" -> "tpm_loongson" >>> v4-v5: None >>> >>>   MAINTAINERS | 1 + >>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> I'm just curious. Why is this patch kept outside the tmp_loongson >> patch set? > > Hi, Yanteng. Thanks for your reply. > > > When sending this patch, git send-email prompted "too many commands" > > and disconnected from the server. Then I sent this patch separately. > > Even after setting sendemail.smtpBatchSize to 100, I still have this > problem. > > Now I am trying to find  Loongson SMTP server administrator to solve it. This is the best solution. > > Have you ever encountered this kind of problem? This seems to be a feature of the Loongson mailbox. I've observed that Yang Tiezhu also has a patch that is outside of the patch set. An interesting pattern is that there are only five emails in one patch set. Thanks, Yanteng > > > BR, Qunqin. > >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Yanteng >