From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0F9F298CB1 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749559053; cv=none; b=URZjenPIeDJR9/at4rRtbsvXKIK6Wvxhkt1sf7iR21/ybzUzej8G4R+3ToHozUcY5FVvsUOO3NW6J8dCQQxbrH8CTvJZkUgJdfMO3fFWDNFwP6EH5VqBk1vR8xopolhjRwwMDV3jTPVt3EXsktC0Ab1k42Ovb20eFH4U+QBW2Eo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749559053; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZcEhrgMhE7NTsUQib/yV+rSwyvjiLTa6R/gpG5JjouM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=TzlP7GRpkCVp8QTejnDBa/h0mGMmMzqaMAycRsHRDyw1fBRgyoE7PjeB/w50TJJ5h2rHPLNf6rPDIjAdTko2mqrOs642z9MbUomU0tfxfEybhk05hw3oDEs6+uvtDbywrSKHPAgeiHVq2KEzwWtDSNYgOwoq2jvyJGB405k6yhM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=GxgwfAts; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="GxgwfAts" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 55A9wDCX027642; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:25 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=0ujY3M KE4iUOIxF9NWDvPVDFS4q2pmilMgOnRHaEcd4=; b=GxgwfAtsQi9lQX9R/vPhsE XeD5NjwuUWoOidSYEgMNmXRf841NCEWLIogcuXceU0c7B0jgZNRaRy0UT//ZyVrQ xT5QX2zDtFSFhfunbQqxwhmR5QCAUZnETGjIJf5bwzcDax1RUAbo6qQQOWj6qI95 j895QVW3T0UmpL0wwPc2agKn6XwgrBwuP2Xz6uf5bMBJYqXbSKNl144w4ltQyBM2 GWGwXgOwwVulQO4mT9RroEySUFNaWuxh0N3IatbvKRTBIZ2NriassldJkHQ03AHL NA/quzk6nQk7DFi/goWpqRsf1dVZJ9qBagCiiaG9X9ZiOZGFTYstQdk3R0aT5cwQ == Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 474x4m3bn9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 55A98G67014908; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:24 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4750rp2bge-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:24 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.102]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 55ACbJQQ43450720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:20 GMT Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D6120043; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE04F20040; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.111.152.178] (unknown [9.111.152.178]) by smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:19 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <8bf5f1b2-db97-4923-aab0-0d2a8b269221@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:37:19 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: CI: Another strange crypto message in syslog To: Eric Biggers , Herbert Xu Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, freude@linux.ibm.com, dengler@linux.ibm.com References: <20250605142641.GA1248@sol> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Ingo Franzki In-Reply-To: <20250605142641.GA1248@sol> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Y4X4sgeN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=68482705 cx=c_pps a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:117 a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=6IFa9wvqVegA:10 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=FNyBlpCuAAAA:8 a=BascJXSDbS2ylCxpsY0A:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=RlW-AWeGUCXs_Nkyno-6:22 X-Proofpoint-GUID: -XB_HE0Cxv1xRAlwsErzwt7lM9sp1Wq0 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: -XB_HE0Cxv1xRAlwsErzwt7lM9sp1Wq0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwNjEwMDA5NiBTYWx0ZWRfXwv4PtOOtslS7 LyjEz4OiMOjETU2Ijkaj9PYvHrPrTYVuNJkkRuwWu/2ePC4AGRD3gZZDfdfnNmhw/4PKvcu2HHt bjlgyLw6zRrf8IJ2IKwG2cjbPI1ZLP56G7pKEaQOJOFm8Y9+CaU/jvDxMK7ouO4KjUKGpThol9M 57moEn4bcnR0xJ9k7zrt9tQrR5Wg9tm/sp+UEf3oDyYZoghLwCwmCLY8jV8MaUqXWDW5VSG/8Hl nX897itIvauMe5PI6BiJTlKkpb9hwprQ813kkQ+iSzBJ5Zy8/x56H+t2gUR0LMG/hxaDAX8Kt+e Xr0Inx4MHYOR9RFPZSBgZAPqM9DJAjUAg2mSaybr5Pnk5J0RoSyGHTlMkBvsTEcOGuBoKA7Py6f iV43JrAl1xR56Psej4sXcXR+WAv2bkkhIXp1mf56hSUoW/rAUn00mz80HyKg9C5GGjnREgWE X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.0.736,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-06-10_04,2025-06-10_01,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam authscore=0 authtc=n/a authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2505280000 definitions=main-2506100096 On 05.06.2025 16:26, Eric Biggers wrote: > No, it's from the following commit: > > commit ef93f1562803cd7bb8159e3abedaf7f47dce4e35 > Author: Herbert Xu > Date: Wed Apr 30 16:17:02 2025 +0800 > > Revert "crypto: run initcalls for generic implementations earlier" > > That moved the crypto_shash support for hmac and sha256 from subsys_initcall to > module_init, which put at the same level as crypto_hkdf_module_init which > depends on it. > > I guess we just move crypto_hkdf_module_init to late_initcall for now. It still fails the same way in a current next kernel. Will there be a fix for it any time soon? BTW: I guess there is a typo: "basic hdkf test(hmac(sha256)): failed to allocate transform: -2" should probably read: "basic hkdf ..." All the code around this string is about HKDF (HMAC Key Derivation Function), not HDKF. -- Ingo Franzki eMail: ifranzki@linux.ibm.com Tel: ++49 (0)7031-16-4648 Linux on IBM Z Development, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen, Germany IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen Geschäftsführung: David Faller Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 IBM DATA Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/us/en/