From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: essiv - Replace memcpy() + NUL-termination with strscpy()
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:08:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99BDF560-307D-4F94-BC14-44B58ED579CC@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250323102057.79c810f1@pumpkin>
Hi David,
On 23. Mar 2025, at 11:20, David Laight wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:15:04 +0100 Thorsten Blum wrote:
>
>> Use strscpy() to copy the NUL-terminated string 'p' to the destination
>> buffer instead of using memcpy() followed by a manual NUL-termination.
>>
>> No functional changes intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
>> ---
>
> The 'len' argument to strscpy() is supposed to be the length of the
> buffer (in order to avoid overflow) not the number of characters.
Not necessarily, see linux/string.h:
/**
* strscpy - Copy a C-string into a sized buffer
* ...
* The size argument @... is only required when @dst is not an array, or
* when the copy needs to be smaller than sizeof(@dst).
* ...
*/
> In this case the bound check is before the copy (and the buffer assumed
> to be the right size!)
> So memcpy() + terminate is exactly correct.
Yes, this is simply a refactoring, there's nothing wrong with memcpy()
followed by a manual NUL-termination.
However, strscpy() is shorter and semantically better imo because we're
copying C-strings and not just raw bytes. strscpy() also has additional
compile-time checks regarding C-strings that memcpy() doesn't.
Thanks,
Thorsten
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-23 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-16 21:15 [PATCH] crypto: essiv - Replace memcpy() + NUL-termination with strscpy() Thorsten Blum
2025-03-21 11:07 ` Herbert Xu
2025-03-23 10:20 ` David Laight
2025-03-23 13:08 ` Thorsten Blum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99BDF560-307D-4F94-BC14-44B58ED579CC@linux.dev \
--to=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox