From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Sergey Shtylyov" <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>,
"Roman Smirnov" <r.smirnov@omp.ru>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Andrew Zaborowski" <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com>
Cc: <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: prevent NULL pointer dereference in find_asymmetric_key()
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:27:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D44DK087Y80R.25CNND6WHJ7EE@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8774f6a2-9bec-b699-6b68-63a26019c5b3@omp.ru>
On Thu Sep 12, 2024 at 4:51 PM EEST, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> On 9/11/24 4:18 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> [...]
>
> >>>> In find_asymmetric_key(), if all NULLs are passed in id_{0,1,2} parameters
> >>>> the kernel will first emit WARN and then have an oops because id_2 gets
> >>>> dereferenced anyway.
> >>>>
> >>>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static
> >>>> analysis tool.
> >>>
> >>> Weird, I recall that I've either sent a patch to address the same site
> >>> OR have commented a patch with similar reasoning. Well, it does not
> >>> matter, I think it this makes sense to me.
> >>>
> >>> You could further add to the motivation that given the panic_on_warn
> >>> kernel command-line parameter, it is for the best limit the scope and
> >>> use of the WARN-macro.
> >>
> >> I don't understand what you mean -- this version of the patch keeps
> >> the WARN_ON() call, it just moves that call, so that the duplicate id_{0,1,2}
> >> checks are avoided...
> >
> > I overlooked the code change (my bad sorry). Here's a better version of
> > the first paragraph:
> >
> > "find_asymmetric_keys() has nullity checks of id_0 and id_1 but ignores
> > validation for id_2. Check nullity also for id_2."
>
> Hm, what about WARN_ON(!id_0 && !id_1 && !id_2) -- it used to check all
> the pointers, right? I think our variant was closer to reality... :-)
Right (lazy validation, first null ignores rest)
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 11:18 [PATCH v2] KEYS: prevent NULL pointer dereference in find_asymmetric_key() Roman Smirnov
2024-09-10 13:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-10 17:38 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-11 13:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-11 13:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-11 14:45 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-12 14:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-13 19:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-12 13:51 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-12 14:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2024-09-12 17:36 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-12 23:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D44DK087Y80R.25CNND6WHJ7EE@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.zaborowski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=r.smirnov@omp.ru \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox