From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B641CF2A3; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726313361; cv=none; b=Fh5RR4WW2hWVtnAD4bV0Cd64hf7n05tBbsm6fZJzB3x0jqsvTnwrRhO/StEnfumfIZ14R928p40g39FW7nlEsX3h0RuUOUOuOYjaYJdD8+09Pddul7u4oq4rPrmH9lKLUuQV1+4mx7im4p/IO4h7KJ5LgZvl1aLWZOO6Vmq65es= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726313361; c=relaxed/simple; bh=casbvh9kbHncZBmUL5DCOYGilWBuBqqCYSzHdmiNt/8=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From:To:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=MqqATcEVUYvn+wBd0LmxU+eLNF+rchF1qiekY2SMHsVs9M+VzaRB/x8u1yZZ9IqrMh/UMOxBPzhwDwEgxsx/U+fN5tzCIDNReELoxI+XjT0BTljZVV4qkGkL8pZzm0CsmcgPh8LbWSRnPF7QSySCdOBeDKIB9NuHS/UHtEAnmIU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=j+wCW3dB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="j+wCW3dB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BBEDC4CEC0; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:29:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1726313360; bh=casbvh9kbHncZBmUL5DCOYGilWBuBqqCYSzHdmiNt/8=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=j+wCW3dBq0EzO2qOfJrE/61ylDd4Yq+Xa+vSSkwJSxd69j5q9OwCTm/8rq7OJv5/g 1z2Lc27tHVsveKkEbDNaCQU604YToadR1nmCTtiP/jqF+aA2TgMNT+rwtWsrjz8ugK 2PkjhVn3L460P3Xi2pQZGOHmELfRfSFVJJQyLZ8GaLfoGTlCNA66RgJcJj4v5hHmBb gq9RzEimoGW99aR3IjN4F5i+zfmjK4M64okcgtc7dtz5sWXgc1kMDD3jguqjjDJHA/ 1GVpIdyCmXE50MmtSLkVEk0OoPi3oCH6SviONFHqoBebYPPuru0oe/EFxDXV07fKsx /foWJMuwpkjpw== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 14:29:16 +0300 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] KEYS: Add support for PGP keys and signatures From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "Herbert Xu" , "Roberto Sassu" Cc: , , , , , , , , , X-Mailer: aerc 0.18.2 References: <20240911122911.1381864-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> In-Reply-To: On Fri Sep 13, 2024 at 7:45 AM EEST, Herbert Xu wrote: > Roberto Sassu wrote: > > > > For the envisioned use cases, PGP operations cannot be done in user spa= ce, > > since the consumers are in the kernel itself (Integrity Digest Cache an= d > > IMA). Also they cannot be done in a trusted initial ram disk, since PGP > > operations can occur also while the system is running (e.g. after softw= are > > package installation). > > Does this address Linus's objections? If not then we cannot proceed. I don't get why integrity digest cache is brought up in patch set discussion in the first place. It is RFC patch set. It is misleading to bring up everywhere as it was something we would need to take in the account. Let's worry about that once it is even a feature. BR, Jarkko