From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mikulas Patocka Subject: Re: Desynchronizing dm-raid1 Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 10:59:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20080513033822.GA9604@gondor.apana.org.au> <20080514011457.GB18728@gondor.apana.org.au> <20080522024225.GA28400@gondor.apana.org.au> <20080522235345.GA4019@gondor.apana.org.au> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon To: Herbert Xu Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080522235345.GA4019@gondor.apana.org.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:32:45AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: >> >> There may be external modules. > > Sorry but we don't support external modules. They should be merged > upstream rather than distributed in the wild. > > Cheers, If you want to negate the meaning of the flag, then you have to write it yourself. I, as non-developer of crypto code, can prove that on given path the input data are read only once --- but I can't prove that on all paths and all possible chaining modes of algorithms the data are read once, because I don't know about all of them. Mikulas