From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF8DC4332F for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 17:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AA26052B for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 17:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239631AbhJFRoa (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:44:30 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:38909 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239592AbhJFRne (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:43:34 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509905C02D5; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:41:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:41:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=benboeckel.net; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=B6xWX/HPA7qmLqQfhnZa5DC/rvu bRmsOYtvzs98jPQ4=; b=L0BKwOc/tpyqm1qr1+H6St1SdWnZVB9IP4g8q6Y84qO EQ55ZIEwqLVUIrAcJLKJ4vMc0vBdOOEGn4JQ9u5VfdGTmeJu/w8vEiN5Q9nDk/8i QETqoX/p/PNRXL0Mi+k/HsukVYLXDkqKb7ZDZjM7eF9lX1b3vhnsUyXH+cUSq/MA eo32YpUw+bZ0egj0rH722YYfnKDl1rM8PlGAIbXLj/kL5jOIovTgb9H62yP78MhW KjNtYQF11Xj6jVkq5ve6MwNfK17ERPqQ/wcnpTpTtUswwzUsKl9wytTj9hzpH/FF 0kbJe5/eQC2Lpu14uY4NqBlgXZ13YlTspGxUHA+H5qw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=B6xWX/ HPA7qmLqQfhnZa5DC/rvubRmsOYtvzs98jPQ4=; b=c6M64nB5Kiuc794NiPxomo Qs47be7wmUBoF++Q7EOpUUBQ0oHlzD0VqEbSVQkA+UUTKQM83gLfR9h85o433Dmm wP2Zeqh/JCdznsx6nNkMVPgzSsvqtvAmvVNGdWiheDWI4tUBSfajJAVz6XgIV7+M IWsjQfbGYM+Yls7RHpdZZxBSBxVDcLP4Rjm3ZlezAS0tXitDVgfw+aUFH1lHTOnc KG5WtPqASuq9kpvOecXa04JASMfwu1GnEqQw+72Wcg+dhIp4ij8NWjXb2prWO2c4 A9GoTM4QpGDgPJkjVmAEKtNFvdg3osyc4LiQLVC3JsK3oBzbfpwKcja+R7FbWgCw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeliedguddufecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpeeuvghn uceuohgvtghkvghluceomhgvsegsvghnsghovggtkhgvlhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepvefftdettefgtddtkeeufeegtddttdeuueegkeegteffueetffejudeihefh kedtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmh gvsegsvghnsghovggtkhgvlhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:41:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:41:38 -0400 From: Ben Boeckel To: Colin King Cc: David Howells , Herbert Xu , "David S . Miller" , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto : asymmetric_keys: Fix function description to match prototype Message-ID: References: <20211006172350.1025091-1-colin.king@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211006172350.1025091-1-colin.king@canonical.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.7 (2021-05-04) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 18:23:50 +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > The function arguments in the description does not match the prototype. > Fix this by renaming trust_keys to trusted_keys. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > --- > crypto/asymmetric_keys/verify_pefile.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/verify_pefile.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/verify_pefile.c > index 7553ab18db89..148cad70fe79 100644 > --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/verify_pefile.c > +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/verify_pefile.c > @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int pefile_digest_pe(const void *pebuf, unsigned int pelen, > * verify_pefile_signature - Verify the signature on a PE binary image > * @pebuf: Buffer containing the PE binary image > * @pelen: Length of the binary image > - * @trust_keys: Signing certificate(s) to use as starting points > + * @trusted_keys: Signing certificate(s) to use as starting points > * @usage: The use to which the key is being put. > * > * Validate that the certificate chain inside the PKCS#7 message inside the PE FYI, this was submitted earlier this week with Message-Id: 20211004001731.26240-1-rdunlap@infradead.org which also fixes the `Return:` notation for the return value docs. --Ben