From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
mingo@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
charishma1.gairuboyina@intel.com, kumar.n.dwarakanath@intel.com,
lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/15] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support AES algorithm using Key Locker instructions
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:48:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaWfKB+k66MzNtIi@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124200700.15888-12-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:06:56PM -0800, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/Makefile b/arch/x86/crypto/Makefile
> index ef6c0b9f69c6..f696b037faa5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/crypto/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/Makefile
> @@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL) += aesni-intel.o
> aesni-intel-y := aesni-intel_asm.o aesni-intel_glue.o aes-intel_glue.o
> aesni-intel-$(CONFIG_64BIT) += aesni-intel_avx-x86_64.o aes_ctrby8_avx-x86_64.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_KL) += aeskl-intel.o
> +aeskl-intel-y := aeskl-intel_asm.o aesni-intel_asm.o aeskl-intel_glue.o aes-intel_glue.o
This makes the object files aesni-intel_asm.o and aes-intel_glue.o each be built
into two separate kernel modules. My understanding is that duplicating code
like that is generally frowned upon. These files should either be built into a
separate module, which both aesni-intel.ko and aeskl-intel.ko would depend on,
or aeskl-intel.ko should depend on aesni-intel.ko.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/aeskl-intel_asm.S b/arch/x86/crypto/aeskl-intel_asm.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d56ec8dd6644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aeskl-intel_asm.S
This file gets very long after all the modes are added (> 1100 lines). Is there
really no feasible way to share code between this and aesni-intel_asm.S, similar
to how the arm64 AES implementations work? Surely most of the logic is the
same, and it's just the actual AES instructions that differ?
> +config CRYPTO_AES_KL
> + tristate "AES cipher algorithms (AES-KL)"
> + depends on (LD_VERSION >= 23600) || (LLD_VERSION >= 120000)
> + depends on DM_CRYPT
'depends on DM_CRYPT' doesn't really make sense here, since there is no actual
dependency on dm-crypt in the code.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-24 20:06 [PATCH v3 00/15] x86: Support Key Locker Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] Documentation/x86: Document " Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/cpufeature: Enumerate Key Locker feature Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] x86/insn: Add Key Locker instructions to the opcode map Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] x86/asm: Add a wrapper function for the LOADIWKEY instruction Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] x86/msr-index: Add MSRs for Key Locker internal wrapping key Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] x86/keylocker: Define Key Locker CPUID leaf Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] x86/cpu/keylocker: Load an internal wrapping key at boot-time Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] x86/power/keylocker: Restore internal wrapping key from the ACPI S3/4 sleep states Chang S. Bae
2021-11-30 3:30 ` Eric Biggers
2021-11-30 6:31 ` [PATCH v3-fix " Chang S. Bae
2021-11-30 6:56 ` [PATCH v3 " Bae, Chang Seok
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for Key Locker Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] crypto: x86/aes - Prepare for a new AES implementation Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support AES algorithm using Key Locker instructions Chang S. Bae
2021-11-30 3:48 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2021-11-30 6:57 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-11-30 7:03 ` Dan Williams
2021-12-06 22:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-06 22:59 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-12-02 14:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-06 21:32 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support ECB mode Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support CBC mode Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support CTR mode Chang S. Bae
2021-11-24 20:07 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support XTS mode Chang S. Bae
2021-11-30 3:27 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] x86: Support Key Locker Eric Biggers
2021-11-30 6:36 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-11-30 7:23 ` Eric Biggers
2021-11-30 7:34 ` Bae, Chang Seok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YaWfKB+k66MzNtIi@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=charishma1.gairuboyina@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kumar.n.dwarakanath@intel.com \
--cc=lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox