From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: memneq: avoid implicit unaligned accesses
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:51:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YesOtoqUf5XLQWd5@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220119093109.1567314-1-ardb@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:31:09AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The C standard does not support dereferencing pointers that are not
> aligned with respect to the pointed-to type, and doing so is technically
> undefined behavior, even if the underlying hardware supports it.
>
> This means that conditionally dereferencing such pointers based on
> whether CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y is not the right thing
> to do, and actually results in alignment faults on ARM, which are fixed
> up on a slow path. Instead, we should use the unaligned accessors in
> such cases: on architectures that don't care about alignment, they will
> result in identical codegen whereas, e.g., codegen on ARM will avoid
> doubleword loads and stores but use ordinary ones, which are able to
> tolerate misalignment.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/CAHk-=wiKkdYLY0bv+nXrcJz3NH9mAqPAafX7PpW5EwVtxsEu7Q@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
> crypto/memneq.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-21 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-19 9:31 [PATCH] crypto: memneq: avoid implicit unaligned accesses Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-19 10:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-21 19:51 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-01-28 6:27 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YesOtoqUf5XLQWd5@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).