From: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
qat-linux@intel.com, vdronov@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Adam Guerin <adam.guerin@intel.com>,
Wojciech Ziemba <wojciech.ziemba@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] crypto: qat - use memzero_explicit() for algs
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 10:54:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnTwP/0WNvecE9SJ@silpixa00400314> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YnTo3zfXSXoEX2+R@kroah.com>
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:22:39AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 09:23:25AM +0100, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
> > Use memzero_explicit(), instead of a memset(.., 0, ..) in the
> > implementation of the algorithms, for buffers containing sensitive
> > information to ensure they are wiped out before free.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Adam Guerin <adam.guerin@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wojciech Ziemba <wojciech.ziemba@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_algs.c | 20 +++++++++----------
> > drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c | 20 +++++++++----------
> > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_algs.c b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_algs.c
> > index 873533dc43a7..c42df18e02b2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_algs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_algs.c
> > @@ -637,12 +637,12 @@ static int qat_alg_aead_newkey(struct crypto_aead *tfm, const u8 *key,
> > return 0;
> >
> > out_free_all:
> > - memset(ctx->dec_cd, 0, sizeof(struct qat_alg_cd));
> > + memzero_explicit(ctx->dec_cd, sizeof(struct qat_alg_cd));
>
> This is for structure fields, why does memset() not work properly here?
> The compiler should always call this, it doesn't know what
> dma_free_coherent() does. You are referencing this pointer after the
> memset() call so all should be working as intended here.
>
> Because of this, I don't see why this change is needed. Do you have
> reports of compilers not calling memset() for all of this properly?
Apologies, I had a wrong assumption.
Based on a comment in the memzero_explicit() documentation I assumed it
should be always used to zero sensitive data.
* memzero_explicit - Fill a region of memory (e.g. sensitive
* keying data) with 0s.
I'm going to drop this patch.
Thanks,
--
Giovanni
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-06 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 8:23 [PATCH 00/12] crypto: qat - re-enable algorithms Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 01/12] crypto: qat - use pre-allocated buffers in datapath Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 02/12] crypto: qat - refactor submission logic Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 9:24 ` Greg KH
2022-05-06 9:38 ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 9:40 ` Greg KH
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 03/12] crypto: qat - add backlog mechanism Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 04/12] crypto: qat - fix memory leak in RSA Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 05/12] crypto: qat - remove dma_free_coherent() for RSA Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 06/12] crypto: qat - remove dma_free_coherent() for DH Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 07/12] crypto: qat - set to zero DH parameters before free Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 9:23 ` Greg KH
2022-05-06 10:01 ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 14:41 ` Greg KH
2022-05-07 18:52 ` Eric Biggers
2022-05-09 8:58 ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 08/12] crypto: qat - add param check for RSA Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 09/12] crypto: qat - add param check for DH Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 10/12] crypto: qat - use memzero_explicit() for algs Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 9:22 ` Greg KH
2022-05-06 9:54 ` Giovanni Cabiddu [this message]
2022-05-06 14:38 ` Greg KH
2022-05-09 8:50 ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-09 9:42 ` Greg KH
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 11/12] crypto: qat - honor CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP flag Giovanni Cabiddu
2022-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH 12/12] crypto: qat - re-enable registration of algorithms Giovanni Cabiddu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnTwP/0WNvecE9SJ@silpixa00400314 \
--to=giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com \
--cc=adam.guerin@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qat-linux@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vdronov@redhat.com \
--cc=wojciech.ziemba@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox