Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] Documentation: add a isolation strategy sysfs node for uacce

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:00:40AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 05:04:08PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:29:42AM +0800, Kai Ye wrote:
> > > Update documentation describing sysfs node that could help to
> > > configure isolation strategy for users in the user space. And
> > > describing sysfs node that could read the device isolated state.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kai Ye <yekai13@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce
> > > index 08f2591138af..e09fd160d3fa 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce
> > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce
> > > @@ -19,6 +19,32 @@ Contact:        linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org
> > >  Description:    Available instances left of the device
> > >                  Return -ENODEV if uacce_ops get_available_instances is not provided
> > >  
> > > +What:           /sys/class/uacce/<dev_name>/isolate_strategy
> > > +Date:           Jul 2022
> > 
> > July was a while ago, you sent this patch in August :(
> > 
> 
> Does the date in the sysfs documentation files serve any purpose besides making
> people have to update their patchsets every month?
> 
> The kernel version number would be more useful to readers of the documentation,
> and it wouldn't have to be updated quite as often.

True, I have seen people use that instead, or no date at all, I don't
require it.  But if you do put the field in there, it should at least be
correct :)

thanks,

greg k-h