Re: [PATCH V5 08/21] RISC-V: ACPI: Cache and retrieve the RINTC structure

[Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>]

Hi Conor,

On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:50:07PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey Sunil,
> 
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 05:22:24PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > RINTC structures in the MADT provide mapping between the hartid
> > and the CPU. This is required many times even at run time like
> > cpuinfo. So, instead of parsing the ACPI table every time, cache
> > the RINTC structures and provide a function to get the correct
> > RINTC structure for a given cpu.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> From this patch until "RISC-V: Add ACPI initialization in
> setup_arch()" (which is 19/21), the series fails to build.
> 
> allmodconfig, clang-16:
> ../arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h:22:23: error: unknown type name 'acpi_physical_address'; did you mean 'efi_physical_addr_t'?
> ../arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h:22:51: error: unknown type name 'acpi_size'
> 
> rv32_defconfig, clang-16:
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c:297:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'acpi_disabled'; did you mean '__cpu_disable'?
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c:297:7: warning: address of function '__cpu_disable' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
>
> I ballsed up a toolchain upgrade to gcc-13, so the whole series is
> showing build issues on patchwork for the gcc configurations:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=745787
> 
> However, I suspect that the same patches that fail for clang-16 will
> fail for gcc-13 too, once I have fixed that!
> 
My bad. It is a commit order issue. Let me fix it.

Thanks!
Sunil