From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD2961CD15; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 06:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744094151; cv=none; b=N2KynkgxQGgIMjcDoYe3ci1BTauSXBWqyTnDE00ZxntFGmPyHtGhG6+Szwotk7n4Cr+b5pvSlFdQGOuBou84B0jbBPvDX2UyTIQPa2AryDv2WbpXXiyMjrUGqn6Psi8QbnIed/wl2YfiHVgpiql3mAMgXbazL4cMnFLOJpyjTU0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744094151; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Csqgrzyk+uBAewDCXxAVP30No7fss9Z45XpijiikhNs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NCMlukhFbsXZQ3A0Ao9PYoHGHnXR3A5T/Wq1i1V+v30XqHRZ+UN/1xAaNXgbqYgLWAp/Rcs5DFYJ2qud+qL3SEjm1jMKEEYZhICT19NR9j4JEPm8SkGdu9xM1EW2PW6WzO/+10GyeDq204oFIj7iOqMCuzlNo7c7owFymz0p7+o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CyxrQgFA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CyxrQgFA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF770C4CEE5; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 06:35:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744094151; bh=Csqgrzyk+uBAewDCXxAVP30No7fss9Z45XpijiikhNs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CyxrQgFAql85niNS0g6S67Ta4AYHuTXDHML/VqxfetcqFYjm0PiEl9Lz0dutT3qcH 9nKubvNkkgpYQSKV5mje4Qj2kzWsI8H5BvjgyN2L8GNptItE9smEChP4ZMaOTX+MJL wbhn/Yj17G+9Cwwl0fU25LnD1V1z/0HlxGSN06iY5XT+eggIDljSsCkwYnnAPlxcBT O7saJ3Dhz/KP7RFQs15xx9glGC3sMoxgPR3yYUKwMzSQDnThfWqJGw85vscNHtuJSx oR/3z0xiAw9Kdt0hkHsPUE0jBueVBv4skrIA6FgYZNCEUn2nE5BSjXHaAO05HsA5FM FLbtkafhsPsKg== Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 08:35:46 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Herbert Xu , Linux Crypto List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Uros Bizjak Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree Message-ID: References: <20250408112830.4769244e@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250408112830.4769244e@canb.auug.org.au> * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/Kconfig.assembler > > between commits: > > 984f835009d6 ("crypto: x86 - Remove CONFIG_AS_SHA1_NI") > d032a27e8fe9 ("crypto: x86 - Remove CONFIG_AS_SHA256_NI") > > from the crypto tree and commit: > > a72d55dc3bd6 ("x86/idle: Remove CONFIG_AS_TPAUSE") > > from the tip tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. The resolution looks good to me, thank you! Ingo