From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 994464D8BB; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726239472; cv=none; b=lOkZ5OBJexGHIST1MAdYCBRatZlYQg4cscONI8STSuccyAcDL9wmat8Kur1TZ0zxdCJzJUCyLnoY5YealfbmVBU43dQ35rxa6Lv6HAIipdlvZaEoWF3s0emSdMc5DB4WMPgF24+itq0CDLFel4oX8QpAzqMWw5etooTFmu9phVc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726239472; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s71P89mZ3W54rQGJ2W+BW9+a5VW5k+C+l2iwCeyAKjk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dMDnJb0UgvGk4YfirjgC/CeCzbXUvK62qQNNNQ6P4XPOnHLIR11sW2Tood4elzDpbNKa51E/yZLd7vwOfgR5cGDughN4M8XB4kn3V2ELso5NbwxErQv1k/ZHisUKRRGz7cSs4uhbblTw/QgALrCVDjvDAmbiAnSmTVs2cf14Dzw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b=VvfwAPwJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="VvfwAPwJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CDD8C4CEC0; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="VvfwAPwJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; s=20210105; t=1726239469; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cESnPJPd5KN2wqEJOEZA45EYxyB/wM6lqjeLiC/AT4s=; b=VvfwAPwJn4tqAd97Od/1D43eDs6zlr0WjR4vUT4OFc5w3q8cT20r4RaJOM2IHHyLD/yNM1 DDnHK8O10oSelwqDAkFMj0FkXQCiesoT5o0mKStJ0vLLeximSPQtkeORhqHWIz26TiLNhU Tuqdg0uQsSdt8DqPaYmEBa6ITnAXAmo= Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 37e3f428 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:57:47 +0200 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Alexander Gordeev , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Harald Freudenberger , Stefan Liebler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] s390/vdso: getrandom() vdso implementation Message-ID: References: <20240913130544.2398678-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20240913142924.30385-B-hca@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240913142924.30385-B-hca@linux.ibm.com> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 04:29:24PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > Hi Jason, > > > > On first glance, this series looks perfect. I can't comment too much on > > > the s390 parts, but first pass of the crypto/vdso/api parts looks spot > > > on. Nice going. > > > > > > Were you thinking you'd like me to take these via the random.git tree > > > for 6.12 next week, or were you thinking of delaying it a release and > > > taking it into the arch tree for 6.13? > > > > If you did want it to be in 6.12, assuming this series continues to look > > good, I think we'd still want it to be in -next for at least a week, so > > maybe that'd take the form of me sending an additional late pull during > > the merge window for this. Either way, I'll defer to your judgement > > here, as most of these changes are fiddly s390 things more than anything > > else. > > This series is intended to go into 6.12. I don't see a reason to delay > this for a full release cycle. If something breaks we'll fix it, as usual. > > So a late pull request would be perfectly fine. Alternatively we can > take this via s390 also for a second pull request; whatever you prefer > and is less work for you. Okay, great. I'll queue it up then in random.git. Jason