From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] s390/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vdso implementation
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 21:23:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuSRKLFdYI1gCHh9@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240913173206.30385-C-hca@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 07:32:06PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:22:09PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:13:28PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 03:05:43PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > > The vdso testcases vdso_test_getrandom and vdso_test_chacha pass.
> > >
> > > I'm trying to cross compile this but I'm getting:
> > >
> > > CC vdso_test_chacha
> > > /home/zx2c4/Projects/random-linux/tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/arch/s390/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha.S: Assembler messages:
> > > /home/zx2c4/Projects/random-linux/tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/arch/s390/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha.S:147: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `alsih'
> > >
> > > Any idea what's up?
> >
> > Looks like I needed `-march=arch9`. I can potentially rebuild my
> > toolchains to do this by default, though, if that's a normal thing to
> > have and this is just my toolchain being crappy. Or, if it's not a
> > normal thing to have, do we need to add it to the selftests Makefile?
>
> That needs to be fixed differently, since the kernel build would also
> fail when building for z10. Could you squash the below fix into this
> patch, please?
Done.
> So for the kernel itself including the vdso code, everything is
> correct now. But similar checks are missing within vdso_test_chacha.c.
> I'll provide something for that, so that the test case will be skipped
> if the required instructions are missing, but not today.
Okay. I would assume no rush there, because it's unlikely there are
those machines part of kselftest fleets anyway?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-13 13:05 [PATCH 0/7] s390/vdso: getrandom() vdso implementation Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] s390/facility: Disable compile time optimization for decompressor code Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 13:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] s390/alternatives: Remove ALT_FACILITY_EARLY Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 13:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] s390/facility: Let test_facility() generate static branch if possible Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 13:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] s390/module: Provide find_section() helper Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 13:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] s390/vdso: Allow alternatives in vdso code Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 13:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] s390/vdso: Move vdso symbol handling to separate header file Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 13:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] s390/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vdso implementation Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 13:53 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-13 14:16 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 14:57 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-13 17:37 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 14:13 ` Harald Freudenberger
2024-09-13 15:13 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-13 15:22 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-13 15:24 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-13 17:32 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 19:23 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2024-09-14 17:42 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-09-16 9:08 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-16 11:01 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-09-16 11:23 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-13 13:52 ` [PATCH 0/7] s390/vdso: " Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-13 13:56 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-13 14:29 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-09-13 14:57 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuSRKLFdYI1gCHh9@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stli@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox