From: Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@marvell.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: <schalla@marvell.com>, <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
<lcherian@marvell.com>, <gakula@marvell.com>,
<jerinj@marvell.com>, <hkelam@marvell.com>, <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
<andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <bbhushan2@marvell.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <pstanner@redhat.com>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<linux@treblig.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<rkannoth@marvell.com>, <sumang@marvell.com>,
<gcherian@marvell.com>,
"Rakesh Kudurumalla" <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v1 06/15] octeontx2-af: Add support for CPT second pass
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 10:48:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCLWEQxjCr5kPjNe@optiplex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507123622.GB3339421@horms.kernel.org>
Hi Simon,
On 2025-05-07 at 18:06:22, Simon Horman (horms@kernel.org) wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 06:49:47PM +0530, Tanmay Jagdale wrote:
> > From: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
> >
> > Implemented mailbox to add mechanism to allocate a
> > rq_mask and apply to nixlf to toggle RQ context fields
> > for CPT second pass packets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@marvell.com>
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cn10k.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cn10k.c
> > index 7fa98aeb3663..18e2a48e2de1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cn10k.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cn10k.c
> > @@ -544,6 +544,7 @@ void rvu_program_channels(struct rvu *rvu)
> >
> > void rvu_nix_block_cn10k_init(struct rvu *rvu, struct nix_hw *nix_hw)
> > {
> > + struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
> > int blkaddr = nix_hw->blkaddr;
> > u64 cfg;
> >
> > @@ -558,6 +559,16 @@ void rvu_nix_block_cn10k_init(struct rvu *rvu, struct nix_hw *nix_hw)
> > cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NIX_AF_CFG);
> > cfg |= BIT_ULL(1) | BIT_ULL(2);
>
> As per my comments on an earlier patch in this series:
> bits 1 and 2 have meaning. It would be nice to use a #define to
> convey this meaning to the reader.
Okay sure, I will update the patch series with macros that provide a
clear meaning.
>
> > rvu_write64(rvu, blkaddr, NIX_AF_CFG, cfg);
> > +
> > + cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NIX_AF_CONST);
> > +
> > + if (!(cfg & BIT_ULL(62))) {
> > + hw->cap.second_cpt_pass = false;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + hw->cap.second_cpt_pass = true;
> > + nix_hw->rq_msk.total = NIX_RQ_MSK_PROFILES;
> > }
> >
> > void rvu_apr_block_cn10k_init(struct rvu *rvu)
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_nix.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_nix.c
> > index 6bd995c45dad..b15fd331facf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_nix.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_nix.c
> > @@ -6612,3 +6612,123 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_nix_mcast_grp_update(struct rvu *rvu,
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +configure_rq_mask(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr, int nixlf,
> > + u8 rq_mask, bool enable)
> > +{
> > + u64 cfg, reg;
> > +
> > + cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NIX_AF_LFX_RX_IPSEC_CFG1(nixlf));
> > + reg = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NIX_AF_LFX_CFG(nixlf));
> > + if (enable) {
> > + cfg |= BIT_ULL(43);
> > + reg = (reg & ~GENMASK_ULL(36, 35)) | ((u64)rq_mask << 35);
> > + } else {
> > + cfg &= ~BIT_ULL(43);
> > + reg = (reg & ~GENMASK_ULL(36, 35));
> > + }
>
> Likewise for the bit, mask, and shift here.
>
> And I think that using FIELD_PREP with another mask in place of the shift
> is also appropriate here.
ACK.
>
> > + rvu_write64(rvu, blkaddr, NIX_AF_LFX_RX_IPSEC_CFG1(nixlf), cfg);
> > + rvu_write64(rvu, blkaddr, NIX_AF_LFX_CFG(nixlf), reg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +configure_spb_cpt(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr, int nixlf,
> > + struct nix_rq_cpt_field_mask_cfg_req *req, bool enable)
> > +{
> > + u64 cfg;
> > +
> > + cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NIX_AF_LFX_RX_IPSEC_CFG1(nixlf));
> > + if (enable) {
> > + cfg |= BIT_ULL(37);
> > + cfg &= ~GENMASK_ULL(42, 38);
> > + cfg |= ((u64)req->ipsec_cfg1.spb_cpt_sizem1 << 38);
> > + cfg &= ~GENMASK_ULL(63, 44);
> > + cfg |= ((u64)req->ipsec_cfg1.spb_cpt_aura << 44);
> > + } else {
> > + cfg &= ~BIT_ULL(37);
> > + cfg &= ~GENMASK_ULL(42, 38);
> > + cfg &= ~GENMASK_ULL(63, 44);
> > + }
>
> And here too.
>
> > + rvu_write64(rvu, blkaddr, NIX_AF_LFX_RX_IPSEC_CFG1(nixlf), cfg);
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > +int rvu_mbox_handler_nix_lf_inline_rq_cfg(struct rvu *rvu,
> > + struct nix_rq_cpt_field_mask_cfg_req *req,
> > + struct msg_rsp *rsp)
>
> It would be nice to reduce this to 80 columns wide or less.
> Perhaps like this?
>
> int
> rvu_mbox_handler_nix_lf_inline_rq_cfg(struct rvu *rvu,
> struct nix_rq_cpt_field_mask_cfg_req *req,
> struct msg_rsp *rsp)
>
> Or perhaps by renaming nix_rq_cpt_field_mask_cfg_req to be shorter.
Okay sure. I'll go ahead with the first suggestion so that the function
name is in sync with the rest of the file.
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_reg.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_reg.h
> > index 245e69fcbff9..e5e005d5d71e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_reg.h
> > @@ -433,6 +433,8 @@
> > #define NIX_AF_MDQX_IN_MD_COUNT(a) (0x14e0 | (a) << 16)
> > #define NIX_AF_SMQX_STATUS(a) (0x730 | (a) << 16)
> > #define NIX_AF_MDQX_OUT_MD_COUNT(a) (0xdb0 | (a) << 16)
> > +#define NIX_AF_RX_RQX_MASKX(a, b) (0x4A40 | (a) << 16 | (b) << 3)
> > +#define NIX_AF_RX_RQX_SETX(a, b) (0x4A80 | (a) << 16 | (b) << 3)
>
> FIELD_PREP could be used here in conjunction with #defines
> for appropriate masks here too.
ACK.
>
> >
> > #define NIX_PRIV_AF_INT_CFG (0x8000000)
> > #define NIX_PRIV_LFX_CFG (0x8000010)
>
> ...
Thanks,
Tanmay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-02 13:19 [net-next PATCH v1 00/15] Enable Inbound IPsec offload on Marvell CN10K SoC Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 01/15] crypto: octeontx2: Share engine group info with AF driver Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 02/15] octeontx2-af: Configure crypto hardware for inline ipsec Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-06 20:24 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-08 10:56 ` Bharat Bhushan
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 03/15] octeontx2-af: Setup Large Memory Transaction for crypto Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 04/15] octeontx2-af: Handle inbound inline ipsec config in AF Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-07 9:19 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-07 9:28 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-13 6:08 ` Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 05/15] crypto: octeontx2: Remove inbound inline ipsec config Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 06/15] octeontx2-af: Add support for CPT second pass Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-07 7:58 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-07 12:36 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-13 5:18 ` Tanmay Jagdale [this message]
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 07/15] octeontx2-af: Add support for SPI to SA index translation Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-03 16:12 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2025-05-13 5:08 ` Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-07 12:45 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-13 6:12 ` Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 08/15] octeontx2-af: Add mbox to alloc/free BPIDs Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 09/15] octeontx2-pf: ipsec: Allocate Ingress SA table Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-07 12:56 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-22 9:21 ` Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 10/15] octeontx2-pf: ipsec: Setup NIX HW resources for inbound flows Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-07 10:03 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-07 13:46 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-22 9:56 ` Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 11/15] octeontx2-pf: ipsec: Handle NPA threshold interrupt Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-07 12:04 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-07 14:20 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 12/15] octeontx2-pf: ipsec: Initialize ingress IPsec Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 13/15] octeontx2-pf: ipsec: Manage NPC rules and SPI-to-SA table entries Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-07 15:58 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-22 10:01 ` Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 14/15] octeontx2-pf: ipsec: Process CPT metapackets Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-07 16:30 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-23 4:08 ` Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-02 13:19 ` [net-next PATCH v1 15/15] octeontx2-pf: ipsec: Add XFRM state and policy hooks for inbound flows Tanmay Jagdale
2025-05-07 6:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-07 18:31 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-05 17:52 ` [net-next PATCH v1 00/15] Enable Inbound IPsec offload on Marvell CN10K SoC Leon Romanovsky
2025-05-13 5:11 ` Tanmay Jagdale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCLWEQxjCr5kPjNe@optiplex \
--to=tanmay@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=gcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
--cc=rkannoth@marvell.com \
--cc=rkudurumalla@marvell.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=schalla@marvell.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=sumang@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox