From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E116524466C for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2026 14:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767883536; cv=none; b=f3welsqgKxnLLIto2nNZ+yt5ArBQrtSm+geHEsMBIhwQvRuOs4TcsRo95ylYBsxu7/FJ6RHDyWgIKrvHx+xFTI8rN3S/8F01rvD3d/aFDnWpF6jytjAFVCwTz9wnWmHAFpCsHDBjmEXfLiNWuVFKDfD4VfRm2ADlcqssyNx39xo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767883536; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ScTKP+c2rR672BgupG9wm67XF9gVvJQXcIgn+/1V/bU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bQKqby6BHi/V9alueVyLh9q0xnOHhxG2IrODI1gy/AuZ1e2B0R/hqGBjHeOwb1bjmLMhAZVIw+Wd/olThEBNRvyUsgzjYJMaQb+nLMim1dqm0dS5/lYZvrInFQGXr7cgVWGvXLQFIdD2iyB2GIw/bDapE2Lr5p+YanGhkg6wXWg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=biC90KAV; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=gQQ6ujfu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="biC90KAV"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="gQQ6ujfu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1767883532; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WfT1Va6tq1fm9ghByqfjKPhOxaDhZdEa8+dMcUknkTw=; b=biC90KAV076DZk/5bSAuvtYuAJyOcgOIVbe7WCp8M8NM2HB4CtpNjBj2BBPNnrYtXKNH5i BWs2QAA7aLysHC4pH+AyNrNw/shq4Or2sGktiOD8r5O20uZCPs97fgINf4XTsrNnKfWVtJ Zu9o4tOeJmkBhQFPUjJ9XmHedtmthQo= Received: from mail-ej1-f69.google.com (mail-ej1-f69.google.com [209.85.218.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-541-wTvGWXZYPwavq0-uvLIumA-1; Thu, 08 Jan 2026 09:45:31 -0500 X-MC-Unique: wTvGWXZYPwavq0-uvLIumA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: wTvGWXZYPwavq0-uvLIumA_1767883530 Received: by mail-ej1-f69.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b7cea4b3f15so492510166b.3 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2026 06:45:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1767883530; x=1768488330; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WfT1Va6tq1fm9ghByqfjKPhOxaDhZdEa8+dMcUknkTw=; b=gQQ6ujfuJzml/KBLnIXj54BCYc2nxgPB9t6/LuLljS1IStToOxMznbLUwwhwhude1h LajIcqp998QUdwdsmhb/KJumfrf3fXJjcJmMb3DBzxNEJb4GMI0/oU0SAdU6OPukTRCG 57y21KggPCE37un7p2LPQlbGx/Ls1HMBrivsc3J48sCUGcl1c2BwYRp2xFw47Swya7/H kf3UQnb8AM2jqE/Ab4ApPIRojNXxeWq844Hde4dt+QyqwwW+QNHNGgMCLTHakCDo/qcc YbBQ9lVJq3s7930WfljUVMOt+BSdMWh4G0xXChs6jn2Nj65FMbNI2Ca5jv83uCN6TN7t LuWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1767883530; x=1768488330; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WfT1Va6tq1fm9ghByqfjKPhOxaDhZdEa8+dMcUknkTw=; b=QOJLJPOSzmr2WCvztzw4RRJx17akZr0s3xa1O6szd15CkHDuTe1kqgT02qTemNDIIw pZKP7mpru+ThjQLEUNO/O+sjXmXcSSt6JMRoDRRpmJ12vZFCM+MMThWU1t6TqarpIwh7 MYZhsAMGht5/MJfoYz+d4KuSVPDm07MTMVJgAEkfvVbRIkw4ZRpfFMFeIENYTbPCbu/a wEeD0pEYumxZC9XOXXdthW9o/kbQCfWqLggh4mZNDnqwN8rV+sDzgfuigJOxKJxl3EYR 9WZnA4GFcXDcWU+csA7VMlj8uq3who5uoVgAz69x3iQk/D80nhtRIQeBhSBf9vdgO3OX 9DVg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXyddoM3XrKzcagLU2ExCuEGEvzvPtKJSYwGlmNHxY1KisCr2rV1wO7hC5kcEVm4B8o34v2nIJfhtOZeCY=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwgdCIKckVV833KXPXAFkt2Rp+S4JgNgr40WswQ1eP/GaXVUREY vjf6sPGY5NHWV13HIxddAZAwOPBJqn544NHnDoP469gUbpz+ZSpqcp63Yk7wIfbxpqktD0Cu9qz 2XJtoPFXP7wtf5y4n5EWo0mX7TQtx4xFMpt4zXbG3Dg820+gHgLk79bE67JPyEQvncw== X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX6xEYmoLi+Ialxp4kZX+ZUNnDirQAF8WtBiUULT7tjpWhZpiWRCLG7dkA8pF1Z 1MBkzV1rt9KKJ06ylVAlHEt3IkV4O/jhEBYL6h+7mwHvleGfWM5TlDoRPCYiwllTfK3k/K7XDh1 dF1oOPNu2lkM78fasU8durEMoqw1FsbvIAyj43Jxgkv8kCrf8na7hxtgkV4STYvsfegYqQp5vTF VLHQMM8cUF9CraVtxqWwEbqQr8TPNmz8jnziXdDsmrLAZBb2AJCpmFEWz0go/5eZMT4VCxV3Qbc D7W1OthfqJGiA8lpEdMrWdXI7MVW0lQUNb/9aFp9yFgBHdZpjw4Tc5YZg/VgLAlI57Qu/Lt8Y2a sxf8Lg8W6r+h2UBew X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c103:b0:b79:e974:4060 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b8444fd41a2mr660535766b.48.1767883530438; Thu, 08 Jan 2026 06:45:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEy4t9xkgOZMs7kPUcCm9yBAey59kExadAcY+9phGlSdjSpATKGUSBjtzXbWCkzKn2HKwCwkQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c103:b0:b79:e974:4060 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b8444fd41a2mr660529166b.48.1767883529753; Thu, 08 Jan 2026 06:45:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from sgarzare-redhat ([193.207.223.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-b842a564255sm848076466b.63.2026.01.08.06.45.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Jan 2026 06:45:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:45:20 +0100 From: Stefano Garzarella To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang , Jonathan Corbet , Olivia Mackall , Herbert Xu , Jason Wang , Paolo Bonzini , Stefan Hajnoczi , Eugenio =?utf-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Gerd Hoffmann , Xuan Zhuo , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Petr Tesarik , Leon Romanovsky , Jason Gunthorpe , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/15] vsock/virtio: reorder fields to reduce padding Message-ID: References: <20260108091514-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20260108092931-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260108092931-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 09:32:23AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 03:27:04PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 09:17:49AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 03:11:36PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 03:23:41AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > > > Reorder struct virtio_vsock fields to place the DMA buffer (event_list) >> > > > last. This eliminates the padding from aligning the struct size on >> > > > ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin >> > > > --- >> > > > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 8 +++++--- >> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > > > >> > > > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> > > > index ef983c36cb66..964d25e11858 100644 >> > > > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> > > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> > > > @@ -60,9 +60,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock { >> > > > */ >> > > > struct mutex event_lock; >> > > > bool event_run; >> > > > - __dma_from_device_group_begin(); >> > > > - struct virtio_vsock_event event_list[8]; >> > > > - __dma_from_device_group_end(); >> > > > + >> > > > u32 guest_cid; >> > > > bool seqpacket_allow; >> > > > >> > > > @@ -76,6 +74,10 @@ struct virtio_vsock { >> > > > */ >> > > > struct scatterlist *out_sgs[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1]; >> > > > struct scatterlist out_bufs[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1]; >> > > > + >> > > >> > > IIUC we would like to have these fields always on the bottom of this struct, >> > > so would be better to add a comment here to make sure we will not add other >> > > fields in the future after this? >> > >> > not necessarily - you can add fields after, too - it's just that >> > __dma_from_device_group_begin already adds a bunch of padding, so adding >> > fields in this padding is cheaper. >> > >> >> Okay, I see. >> >> > >> > do we really need to add comments to teach people about the art of >> > struct packing? >> >> I can do it later if you prefer, I don't want to block this work, but yes, >> I'd prefer to have a comment because otherwise I'll have to ask every time >> to avoid, especially for new contributors xD > >On the one hand you are right on the other I don't want it >duplicated each time __dma_from_device_group_begin is invoked. yeah, I see. >Pls come up with something you like, and we'll discuss. sure, I'll check a bit similar cases to have some inspiration. > >> > >> > > Maybe we should also add a comment about the `ev`nt_lock` >> > > requirement we >> > > have in the section above. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Stefano >> > >> > hmm which requirement do you mean? >> >> That `event_list` must be accessed with `event_lock`. >> >> So maybe we can move also `event_lock` and `event_run`, so we can just move >> that comment. I mean something like this: >> >> >> @@ -74,6 +67,15 @@ struct virtio_vsock { >> */ >> struct scatterlist *out_sgs[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1]; >> struct scatterlist out_bufs[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1]; >> + >> + /* The following fields are protected by event_lock. >> + * vqs[VSOCK_VQ_EVENT] must be accessed with event_lock held. >> + */ >> + struct mutex event_lock; >> + bool event_run; >> + __dma_from_device_group_begin(); >> + struct virtio_vsock_event event_list[8]; >> + __dma_from_device_group_end(); >> }; >> >> static u32 virtio_transport_get_local_cid(void) > >Yea this makes sense. Thanks for that! Stefano