From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@nvidia.com>,
"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
"Koichiro Den" <den@valinux.co.jp>,
"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
mhi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dmaengine: Add API to combine configuration and preparation (sg and single)
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 12:04:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa6pW-zpxnrZnfPn@vaman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218-dma_prep_config-v2-1-c07079836128@nxp.com>
On 18-12-25, 10:56, Frank Li wrote:
> Previously, configuration and preparation required two separate calls. This
> works well when configuration is done only once during initialization.
>
> However, in cases where the burst length or source/destination address must
> be adjusted for each transfer, calling two functions is verbose and
> requires additional locking to ensure both steps complete atomically.
>
> Add a new API dmaengine_prep_config_single() and dmaengine_prep_config_sg()
> and callback device_prep_config_sg() that combines configuration and
> preparation into a single operation. If the configuration argument is
> passed as NULL, fall back to the existing implementation.
>
> Add a new API dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() and
> dmaengine_prep_config_sg_safe() for re-entrancy, which require driver
> implement callback device_prep_config_sg().
Okay to add API
> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *(*device_prep_config_sg)(
> + struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> + unsigned int sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> + unsigned long flags, struct dma_slave_config *config,
> + void *context);
Do we want to have drivers implement one more callback. It does not make
sense to me. Why not handle this in framework and have it call the
respective lower level APIs.
Drivers should implement simple apis and collectively the functionality
can come from the framework.
Would you consider revising as such. Bonus all existing drivers can
start using this API, no change required for drivers in that case
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 15:56 [PATCH v2 0/8] dmaengine: Add new API to combine onfiguration and descriptor preparation Frank Li
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dmaengine: Add API to combine configuration and preparation (sg and single) Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:33 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-23 10:41 ` Vinod Koul
2026-03-09 11:04 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2026-03-09 14:42 ` Frank Li
2026-03-17 10:37 ` Vinod Koul
2026-03-17 14:04 ` Frank Li
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Use dmaenigne_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:34 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:35 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass dma_slave_config to dw_edma_device_transfer() Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:38 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] nvmet: pci-epf: Remove unnecessary dmaengine_terminate_sync() on each DMA transfer Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:38 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] nvmet: pci-epf: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:42 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] PCI: epf-mhi: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank Li
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() API Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa6pW-zpxnrZnfPn@vaman \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=mhi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox