From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-178.mta0.migadu.com (out-178.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F143285041 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2026 07:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775978303; cv=none; b=Khi96XKEiAW3GNuZqxhf6LWzOznHunctanFJSUH85fcC7ziv2/WkO2VQ/9uMBjpb94QlTgqKDD9QivDD78g5pAnwZ4dWqwpLwGdMoU/XK3PSUD+CI9CcGlLdt3A2oQ//mGrE9F2VPh/bFml03TnVuK4bCVKZye/vXzVNxKRqkUE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775978303; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7FZjoNTBQGMY3y6KcLIwvae+g6bNeS361jS+pJOYa3w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Gr+tv+JPaiNBIZHqJ9Am6nAWdcUt8V83qT4wl9jL2kNPCwI7bQwMmTI5y+EtfK6Ahehut8JYRhpkCxryLFmiGkbHfJYA4NTz5dcNcyr9BiSpSs67guVErK6omI9TPF/hNCv1LZ4NY1Ir/xPsIlF8THuSjpw08+Dn8H9JUIqNhNo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=aYFajoX9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="aYFajoX9" Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 09:18:13 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1775978299; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UrOHZVZL38C6MgwICRN4Rb/b7X1X7UQKjoQlDB9L2ho=; b=aYFajoX9/l0+IIExwKph5VA+Fe71nYSPR2sNFgBZnutveAXeMIKuTJLMXmtjuyyRGNrMx/ YA5kNnSvlgl1QATt2ZZ3pncYG7AlvO07Nzd70RC6GJTBJAmj/SZA/J8b1LC/C4nSco05K7 Pvqh7P98KD2SBy6teLKPvzn45BfpQqg= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Thorsten Blum To: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: atmel-ecc - add support for atecc608b Message-ID: References: <20260330100800.389042-3-thorsten.blum@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Sun, Apr 12, 2026 at 01:51:10PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 12:08:00PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote: > > Tested on hardware with an ATECC608B at 0x60. The device binds > > successfully, passes the driver's sanity check, and registers the > > ecdh-nist-p256 KPP algorithm. > > > > The hardware ECDH path was also exercised using a minimal KPP test > > module, covering private key generation, public key derivation, and > > shared secret computation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum > > --- > > drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > Is there supposed to be a 2/2 or should I apply this patch on its > own? Patch 2/2 is here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260330100800.389042-4-thorsten.blum@linux.dev/ Thanks, Thorsten