From: "Guozihua (Scott)" <guozihua@huawei.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/crypto: poly1305 fix a read out-of-bound
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:26:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af603c68-f597-7ccc-e0c9-ee47530cda08@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ys0d9KPadnltgwae@sol.localdomain>
On 2022/7/12 15:08, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 11:32:15AM +0800, GUO Zihua wrote:
>> A kasan error was reported during fuzzing:
>>
>> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in neon_poly1305_blocks.constprop.0+0x1b4/0x250 [poly1305_neon]
>> Read of size 4 at addr ffff0010e293f010 by task syz-executor.5/1646715
>> CPU: 4 PID: 1646715 Comm: syz-executor.5 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.10.0.aarch64 #1
>> Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.59 01/31/2019
>> Call trace:
>> dump_backtrace+0x0/0x394
>> show_stack+0x34/0x4c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:196
>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
>> dump_stack+0x158/0x1e4 lib/dump_stack.c:118
>> print_address_description.constprop.0+0x68/0x204 mm/kasan/report.c:387
>> __kasan_report+0xe0/0x140 mm/kasan/report.c:547
>> kasan_report+0x44/0xe0 mm/kasan/report.c:564
>> check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:187 [inline]
>> __asan_load4+0x94/0xd0 mm/kasan/generic.c:252
>> neon_poly1305_blocks.constprop.0+0x1b4/0x250 [poly1305_neon]
>> neon_poly1305_do_update+0x6c/0x15c [poly1305_neon]
>> neon_poly1305_update+0x9c/0x1c4 [poly1305_neon]
>> crypto_shash_update crypto/shash.c:131 [inline]
>> shash_finup_unaligned+0x84/0x15c crypto/shash.c:179
>> crypto_shash_finup+0x8c/0x140 crypto/shash.c:193
>> shash_digest_unaligned+0xb8/0xe4 crypto/shash.c:201
>> crypto_shash_digest+0xa4/0xfc crypto/shash.c:217
>> crypto_shash_tfm_digest+0xb4/0x150 crypto/shash.c:229
>> essiv_skcipher_setkey+0x164/0x200 [essiv]
>> crypto_skcipher_setkey+0xb0/0x160 crypto/skcipher.c:612
>> skcipher_setkey+0x3c/0x50 crypto/algif_skcipher.c:305
>> alg_setkey+0x114/0x2a0 crypto/af_alg.c:220
>> alg_setsockopt+0x19c/0x210 crypto/af_alg.c:253
>> __sys_setsockopt+0x190/0x2e0 net/socket.c:2123
>> __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2134 [inline]
>> __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2131 [inline]
>> __arm64_sys_setsockopt+0x78/0x94 net/socket.c:2131
>> __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:36 [inline]
>> invoke_syscall+0x64/0x100 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48
>> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x220/0x230 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155
>> do_el0_svc+0xb4/0xd4 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:217
>> el0_svc+0x24/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:353
>> el0_sync_handler+0x160/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:369
>> el0_sync+0x160/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:683
>>
>> This error can be reproduced by the following code compiled as ko on a
>> system with kasan enabled:
>>
>> char test_data[] = "\x00\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07"
>> "\x08\x09\x0a\x0b\x0c\x0d\x0e\x0f"
>> "\x10\x11\x12\x13\x14\x15\x16\x17"
>> "\x18\x19\x1a\x1b\x1c\x1d\x1e";
>>
>> int init(void)
>> {
>> struct crypto_shash *tfm = NULL;
>> struct shash_desc *desc = NULL;
>> char *data = NULL;
>>
>> tfm = crypto_alloc_shash("poly1305", 0, 0);
>> desc = kmalloc(sizeof(*desc) + crypto_shash_descsize(tfm), GFP_KERNEL);
>> desc->tfm = tfm;
>>
>> data = kmalloc(POLY1305_KEY_SIZE - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>> memcpy(data, test_data, POLY1305_KEY_SIZE - 1);
>> crypto_shash_update(desc, data, POLY1305_KEY_SIZE - 1);
>> crypto_shash_final(desc, data);
>> kfree(data);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> void deinit(void)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> module_init(init)
>> module_exit(deinit)
>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>
>> The root cause of the bug sits in neon_poly1305_blocks. The logic
>> neon_poly1305_blocks() performed is that if it was called with both s[]
>> and r[] uninitialized, it will first try to initialize them with the
>> data from the first "block" that it believed to be 32 bytes in length.
>> First 16 bytes are used as the key and the next 16 bytes for s[]. This
>> would lead to the aforementioned read out-of-bound. However, after
>> calling poly1305_init_arch(), only 16 bytes were deducted from the input
>> and s[] is initialized yet again with the following 16 bytes. The second
>> initialization of s[] is certainly redundent which indicates that the
>> first initialization should be for r[] only.
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue by calling poly1305_init_arm64() instead of
>> poly1305_init_arch(). This is also the implementation for the same
>> algorithm on arm platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: GUO Zihua <guozihua@huawei.com>
>
> Is the special reproducer really needed? I'd expect this to be reproduced by
> the existing crypto self-tests just by booting a kernel built with both
> CONFIG_KASAN=y and CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_EXTRA_TESTS=y.
>
> Also, despite the verbosity of the commit message, it doesn't include the two
> things that really matter, which are a Fixes tag and Cc stable.
>
> - Eric
> .
Hi Eric,
I'll give it a try and post a v2 patch. Thanks!
--
Best
GUO Zihua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-12 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-12 3:32 [PATCH] arm64/crypto: poly1305 fix a read out-of-bound GUO Zihua
2022-07-12 7:08 ` Eric Biggers
2022-07-12 7:26 ` Guozihua (Scott) [this message]
2022-07-12 7:28 ` Eric Biggers
2022-07-12 7:46 ` Guozihua (Scott)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af603c68-f597-7ccc-e0c9-ee47530cda08@huawei.com \
--to=guozihua@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox